2008
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.22.09ho
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The many facets of teaching and learning in Malay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common analysis framework of researchers who work within this field is the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) (Lakoff &Johnson, 1980),which describes the mapping of two domains known as the source and target domains. This theory has been commonly adopted in the analysis of metaphorical expressions in various studies related to certain concepts, such as emotion (Moradi & Mashak, 2014;Türker, 2013), learning (Berendt, 2008;Imran Ho-Abdullah, 2008) and illness (Lendik et al, 2017). The Conceptual Metaphor theory has also been extended to other areas, namely, law (Greenwood, 2005;Hanne & Weisberg, 2018), politics (Charteris-Black, 2011Meisenberg & Meisenberg, 2015), economy (Arrese, 2015;Arrese & Vara-miguel, 2016;Nurul Hijah bte Jasman & Kasim, 2013), psychology (Mc-Mullen & Conway, 2002) and medicine (Ferguson et al, 2010;Golden et al, 2012) due to the pervasive linguistic manifestations of metaphors in different types of discourse.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common analysis framework of researchers who work within this field is the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) (Lakoff &Johnson, 1980),which describes the mapping of two domains known as the source and target domains. This theory has been commonly adopted in the analysis of metaphorical expressions in various studies related to certain concepts, such as emotion (Moradi & Mashak, 2014;Türker, 2013), learning (Berendt, 2008;Imran Ho-Abdullah, 2008) and illness (Lendik et al, 2017). The Conceptual Metaphor theory has also been extended to other areas, namely, law (Greenwood, 2005;Hanne & Weisberg, 2018), politics (Charteris-Black, 2011Meisenberg & Meisenberg, 2015), economy (Arrese, 2015;Arrese & Vara-miguel, 2016;Nurul Hijah bte Jasman & Kasim, 2013), psychology (Mc-Mullen & Conway, 2002) and medicine (Ferguson et al, 2010;Golden et al, 2012) due to the pervasive linguistic manifestations of metaphors in different types of discourse.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%