2019
DOI: 10.3384/njvet.2242-458x.19921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘The mannequin is more lifelike’: The significance of fidelity for students’ learning in simulation-based training in the social- and healthcare programmes

Abstract: The article concerns fidelity in relation to using mannequins in simulation-based training in social-and healthcare education. The article addresses two issues. What influences fidelity, and how does the degree of fidelity influence the students' learning processes? Simulation-based training is organized in three phases; briefing, scenario, and debriefing. The article focuses on the scenario phase. A central issue in relation to the scenario phase is fidelity; i.e. the degree to which the scenario matches the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32 These aspects of fidelity must be considered from the perspective of the learners. [33][34][35][36][37] • Physical (or environmental) fidelity relates to how realistically the physical context of the simulationbased activity compares to 38 the actual environment in which the situation would occur in real life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 These aspects of fidelity must be considered from the perspective of the learners. [33][34][35][36][37] • Physical (or environmental) fidelity relates to how realistically the physical context of the simulationbased activity compares to 38 the actual environment in which the situation would occur in real life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire publikationer er af Aarkrog (Aarkrog, 2018a(Aarkrog, , 2018b(Aarkrog, , 2019Aarkrog & Puge, 2019). Publikation nr.…”
Section: Oversigt Over Inkluderede Publikationerunclassified
“…The literature included a wide variety of research methods, including surveys (e.g., Chandran et al, 2018;Dasmani, 2011;Dumbrell & Smith, 2013), observational studies (e.g., Asplund & Kontio, 2020;Louw, 2013;Sjöberg, 2014), interview-based studies (e.g., Aakernes, 2018;Callan et al, 2015;Heusdens et al, 2018), case studies (e.g., Gleeson, 2016;Kotsifakos et al, 2018), document-based studies (e.g., Nylund & Rosvall, 2016;Rauner et al, 2012), comparisons (e.g., Kap, 2014;Sappa et al, 2016;Schröder, 2019) and evaluations of interventions (e.g., Hoareau et al, 2017;Shrestha, 2016;Yasak & Alias, 2017). Several studies used mixed-method approaches, such as surveys and interviews (e.g., Deitmer & Heinemann, 2017;Stalder, 2012) and "obser-views" that combined observations with interviews (Aarkrog, 2019;Hamid et al, 2012).…”
Section: Included For Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%