2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13073701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Management of Polymer and Biodegradable Composite Waste in Relation to Petroleum-Based Thermoplastic Polymer Waste—In Terms of Energy Consumption and Processability

Abstract: The article presents a comparative analysis of the flow and utilisation of biodegradable polymer waste in relation to the waste of petroleum-based thermoplastic polymers. It compares energy expenditures and the costs of the reutilisation of both types of plastics in industrial applications. The performed studies and an analysis of the yielded results enabled the acquisition of real data involving the subject of managing petroleum-based plastic waste after the end of its life cycle, as well as biodegradable pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bio-based polymers are derived from renewable sources such as starch, cellulose, chitosan, gelatine, poly (lactic acid), polyhydroxybutyrate, polycaprolactone, and polybutylene succinate [ 25 ], while biodegradable polymers are either derived from renewable sources or from fossil-based or petrochemical-based polymers [ 26 ]. Thus, these two polymer groups have differences in which biodegradable polymers will be completely degraded when exposed to aerobic and anaerobic processes, microorganisms, and water, whereas bio-based polymers can be either biodegradable or not biodegradable [ 27 ].…”
Section: Packaging For Food Safety and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bio-based polymers are derived from renewable sources such as starch, cellulose, chitosan, gelatine, poly (lactic acid), polyhydroxybutyrate, polycaprolactone, and polybutylene succinate [ 25 ], while biodegradable polymers are either derived from renewable sources or from fossil-based or petrochemical-based polymers [ 26 ]. Thus, these two polymer groups have differences in which biodegradable polymers will be completely degraded when exposed to aerobic and anaerobic processes, microorganisms, and water, whereas bio-based polymers can be either biodegradable or not biodegradable [ 27 ].…”
Section: Packaging For Food Safety and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Material coordinate system of bio-based (green) and fossil-based polymers (pink), biodegradable polymer (blue); PE: polyethylene; PA: polyamide; PP: polypropylene; PET: poly(ethylene terephthalate); PLA: polylactic acid; PHA: polyhydroxyalkanoate; PHB: polyhydroxy butyrate; TPS: thermoplastic starch; EVOH: ethylene vinyl alcohol; PVC: polyvinyl chloride; PS: polystyrene; PTT: poly trimethylene terephthalate; PBAT: polybutylene adipate terephthalate; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; PBS: polybutylene succinate; PCL: polycaprolactone, reproduced from [ 26 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being still little explored, recycling biopolymers has been proven to be economically, ecologically, and technologically advantageous. Some biodegradable polymers may present more viable recycling steps than petroleum-based polymers, making their use even more attractive [8]. However, it is noted that recycling is more beneficial for biodegradable polymers with thickness above 1 mm, and when the polymer is thinner, it is more profitable to recover it (proper collection) before it is disposed of by composting rather than recycling because thinner polymers degrade more easily [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some biodegradable polymers may present more viable recycling steps than petroleum-based polymers, making their use even more attractive [8]. However, it is noted that recycling is more beneficial for biodegradable polymers with thickness above 1 mm, and when the polymer is thinner, it is more profitable to recover it (proper collection) before it is disposed of by composting rather than recycling because thinner polymers degrade more easily [8,9]. Although numerous works that reported on recovery by recycling, biodegradation test, or even toxicity (such as ecotoxicity with plants) of biodegradable polymers are observed [1,4,[10][11][12], the composites or nanocomposites produced with these polymers have been very little considered [13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%