The Major Histocompatibility System in Man and Animals 1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-95293-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Major Histocompatibility System of the Rat (Ag-B or H-1 System)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the number of alleles is not a good measure of polymorphism (see Introduction) and although the data are quite incomplete, particularly for the hamster, the table suggests that there are differences in the degree of polymorphism among different mammals. The MHC polymorphism in the Syrian hamster appears to be low, perhaps not greater than that of other (non-MHC) polymorphic loci (Duncan & Streilein 1977); the MHC polymorphism in the rat appears to be intermediate between the hamster and the mouse (Glinther & Stark 1979, Wagener et al 1979) and the MHC polymorphism in the human and the mouse may be equally high (Bodmer et al 1977). Because of the incompleteness of the data one cannot be sure that * I, II = class I and class II, these differences are real but at this stage of study they appear to be.…”
Section: T Haplotypesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although the number of alleles is not a good measure of polymorphism (see Introduction) and although the data are quite incomplete, particularly for the hamster, the table suggests that there are differences in the degree of polymorphism among different mammals. The MHC polymorphism in the Syrian hamster appears to be low, perhaps not greater than that of other (non-MHC) polymorphic loci (Duncan & Streilein 1977); the MHC polymorphism in the rat appears to be intermediate between the hamster and the mouse (Glinther & Stark 1979, Wagener et al 1979) and the MHC polymorphism in the human and the mouse may be equally high (Bodmer et al 1977). Because of the incompleteness of the data one cannot be sure that * I, II = class I and class II, these differences are real but at this stage of study they appear to be.…”
Section: T Haplotypesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Genetic analyses: The nomenclature of Serov (1973), Womack (1972aWomack ( , 1972bWomack ( , 1973, Gasser et al (1973), and Yamada et al (1980) is used for the esterase loci, of Mizuno and Suzuki (1978) for amylase, of French et al (1971) for hemoglobin B, of Nikaido and Yamada (1981) for male urinary protein, and of Gunther and Stark (1979) for RTJ haplotypes. Chi-squares for linkage were calculated by the method of Green (1963).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histocompatibility features of the rats and the grafts (dermoepidermic and 150-300 mm: of area) were chosen in order to induce skin graft rejection in an 8-to 10-day period [ 17], As mentioned above, biop sies of the grafts were taken on the 2nd. 5th and 8th postoperative (p.o.)…”
Section: Allograft Rejection Studymentioning
confidence: 99%