2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The main factors affecting cultural exchange between Korea and China: A semantic network analysis based on the cultural governance perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical software R was utilized for all these procedures. Overall analytic procedures were conducted in accordance with the Korean natural language process (NLP), except for scientific articles, since most of the documents were written in Korean [40,41].…”
Section: Topic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical software R was utilized for all these procedures. Overall analytic procedures were conducted in accordance with the Korean natural language process (NLP), except for scientific articles, since most of the documents were written in Korean [40,41].…”
Section: Topic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these materials, the language network is established based on the language text that expresses various issues and agendas and actors' interest in alternatives. This network enables multiple interpretations according to the semantic relationships between subject matter keywords or emotional keywords, such as opinions, attitudes, feelings, and tone, selected from the collection of the language texts describing specific positions on major issues and alternatives [62].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select the words to be studied, we applied the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) technique. The higher the frequency of a word and the lower the number of documents containing the word are, the higher the TF-IDF value the word has [86]. A word with a low TF-IDF value shows that the word is common across the data but has no distinguishable influence between the documents.…”
Section: Semantic Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the network analysis, the prominence of words was evaluated with the degree centrality of each word. Degree centrality measures how a node is related to other nodes [86] and is effective for identifying the important words in a network [87].…”
Section: Semantic Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation