1995
DOI: 10.30861/9780860547976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maglemose Culture: The reconstruction of the social organization of a mesolithic culture in Northern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The chronological gap between the earliest kill/butchering sites during the Late Preboreal/ Early Boreal period and the classical settlement sites during Boreal and Early Atlantic period and the absence of winter sites prevent detailed reconstruction of the annual cycle of occupation and the Maglemose mobility pattern. But considering these few elements, probable mobility of small (family) groups (Grøn 1995), in a relative restricted area or with repeated seasonal occupations of the same areas, can be proposed. This was, for instance, discussed after the discovery and analysis of healed hunting injuries on some mammal bones ), suggesting a certain territoriality of animals and humans, probably at a seasonal level, during this period, and leading occasionally to the hunting of the same ungulate populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chronological gap between the earliest kill/butchering sites during the Late Preboreal/ Early Boreal period and the classical settlement sites during Boreal and Early Atlantic period and the absence of winter sites prevent detailed reconstruction of the annual cycle of occupation and the Maglemose mobility pattern. But considering these few elements, probable mobility of small (family) groups (Grøn 1995), in a relative restricted area or with repeated seasonal occupations of the same areas, can be proposed. This was, for instance, discussed after the discovery and analysis of healed hunting injuries on some mammal bones ), suggesting a certain territoriality of animals and humans, probably at a seasonal level, during this period, and leading occasionally to the hunting of the same ungulate populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the abundance and diversity of archaeological material, the site was interpreted as a settlement site (Sarauw et al 1903) involving a wide range of activities such as lithic production, bone tool manufacture, and subsistence activities. The spatial distribution of lithic waste (Grøn 1995, Blankholm 1996 led to the hypothesis of a small inhabitation for a small group of people on an islet in the middle of a former lake, with a large refuse area in the lake (Figure 2, Leduc 2010b, p. 127-129), as described at Ulkestrup I and II (Andersen 1951, Andersen et al 1982, Grøn 1995.…”
Section: The Mullerup Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the marsh fern has a less broad application, some species of this fern have been used to fight worms and ringworm (Stichmann-Marny and Kretzschmar 1994;Podbielkowski and Sudnik-Wójcikowska 2003). In the Mesolithic, they could have also been used as mattresses (Grøn 1995).…”
Section: Experimental Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dette kan settes i sammenheng med omskjefting og at dette har foregått på lokaliteten. Grøn har påpekt sammenhengen mellom nettopp mikrolitter, ildsteder og hyttetufter (Grøn 1995a). I motsetning til på flere av de andre lokalitetene på prosjektet er det imidlertid ikke påvist strukturer tilknyttet den mellommesolittiske fasen på Nordby 2.…”
Section: Tolkning Av Lokalitetenunclassified
“…Strukturer tolket som stolpehull fremstår ofte som usikre og til tider vanskelig definerbare (Hernek 2005:108). Samtidig er det stor variasjon i de stolpehullene som er dokumentert (f.eks . Grøn 1995a;Jensen 1995;Hernek 2005;Åstveit 2008a; Casati og Sørensen 2009; jf.…”
Section: Stolpehullunclassified