2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3033744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Macroeconomic Effects of the Euro Area's Fiscal Consolidation 2011-2013: A Simulation-Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we compare the baseline multipliers to those derived from a calibration which is more suitable to characterize an economic recovery following a recession. Typically, the early phase of a recovery when output is below potential features severe liquidity constraints, bond spreads reflecting high financial market risk, and lower profitability (Rannenberg, Schoder, and Strasky 2015;Gechert, Hallett, and Rannenberg 2016). In line with that, we increase the share of rule-of-thumb households by 20%-points and the equity risk premium by 2%-points and decrease the core firms' price mark-up by 10%-points.…”
Section: Simulating the Macroeconomic Effects Of Carbon And Labor Tax Increasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we compare the baseline multipliers to those derived from a calibration which is more suitable to characterize an economic recovery following a recession. Typically, the early phase of a recovery when output is below potential features severe liquidity constraints, bond spreads reflecting high financial market risk, and lower profitability (Rannenberg, Schoder, and Strasky 2015;Gechert, Hallett, and Rannenberg 2016). In line with that, we increase the share of rule-of-thumb households by 20%-points and the equity risk premium by 2%-points and decrease the core firms' price mark-up by 10%-points.…”
Section: Simulating the Macroeconomic Effects Of Carbon And Labor Tax Increasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double dip in growth in the EA was mostly due to the coordinated fiscal consolidation among EA country members implemented from 2011 to 2013. Simulations with the European Union (EU) Commission model Quest show that fiscal policy contributed to cumulative GDP deviations from the baseline scenario that vary by country from 8 to 18 per cent, including spillover effects varying from 1 to 2 per cent (in't Veld 2013; see also Rannenberg et al 2015). Fatás/Summers (2015) illustrate how excessive consolidation leaves behind permanent effects via hysteresis and can be self-defeating, even aggravating the public-debt ratio in some cases.…”
Section: The New Role Of Fiscal Policy In Macroeconomic Stabilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several economists have described in the past the design failures of the Eurozone [1]- [7]. This part of the literature emphasized three major reasons for this phenomenon: 1) some members of the Eurozone do not meet the criteria for an optimum currency area; 2) the debility of all members to retain the rules of the Fiscal policy; and 3) the failure of the banking supervision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%