2016
DOI: 10.1257/mac.20150093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Macroeconomic Effects of Monetary Policy: A New Measure for the United Kingdom

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Data for breakevens at shorter maturity are unfortunately not available for all periods. 18 This variable was also used in Cloyne and Hürtgen (2016) in an analysis of UK monetary policy shocks. 19 Following the New Keynesian literature, we also experimented with the change in the labour share, but this lacked empirical significance in all of the specifications we estimated.…”
Section: A What (Other Than the Trend) Explains Inflation Dynamics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Data for breakevens at shorter maturity are unfortunately not available for all periods. 18 This variable was also used in Cloyne and Hürtgen (2016) in an analysis of UK monetary policy shocks. 19 Following the New Keynesian literature, we also experimented with the change in the labour share, but this lacked empirical significance in all of the specifications we estimated.…”
Section: A What (Other Than the Trend) Explains Inflation Dynamics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By conditioning on central bank forecasts available at the time of the policy decision, researchers devised another measure of plausibly random surprises to policy-see Romer and Romer (2004), and the subsequent literature such as Cloyne and Hürtgen (2016) or Coibion et al (2017). Again, measurement of the policy surprise hinges on the assumption that the policymaker does not rely on additional variables for which the staff may not have prepared a forecast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, using the subpopulation of open pegs, we find evidence of considerable attenuation bias in policy responses when we estimate the responses to monetary policy using traditional OLS selection-on-observables identification versus identification with instrumental variables. Second, we investigate the robustness of our new IV estimates of LATE for open pegs as compared to the LATE found by investigating the combined behavior of post-WW2 data from the U.S. and U.K. using the established instrumental variables approaches of Romer and Romer (2004) and Cloyne and Hürtgen (2016). In the latter, instruments are based on staff forecasts available at the time policy was set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of Cloyne and Hürtgen (2014), who find that NIESR forecasts are highly correlated with the Bank of England's Inflation Report projections for the period in which both are available.…”
Section: Gdp 30mentioning
confidence: 99%