1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1982.tb00635.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The macro‐invertebrate fauna of a small Andean stream

Abstract: SUMMARY. The benthic fauna of a small headwater stream in the Amazon drainage in Ecuador was studied from August 1976 to July 1977. The sampling station was at an altitude of 3300 m in a typical paramo habitat of constant and cool temperatures. The fauna is dominated numerically by Hydracarina, Insecta, Copepoda and Oligochaeta, The major insect groups are Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Elmidae (Coleoptera) and Chironomidae (Diptera). Benthos densities followed a bimodal pattern of rapid decreases an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has shown that the functional feeding groups in neotropical rivers are difficult to assign because taxa commonly use at least two trophic levels (TOMANOVA et al, 2006;WANTZEN and WAGNER, 2006;TOMANOVA et al, 2007). Even though the community structure of the Piburja stream was generally similar to those reported in previous work on Andean rivers (TURCOTTE and HARPER, 1982;FLECKER and FEIFAREK, 1994;JACOB-SEN and ENCALADA, 1998), we found important differences in feeding habits when comparing the gut content analysis of those same insect taxa of Bolivia Andean ranges (TOMANOVA et al, 2006). This may be related to the plasticity of feeding habits of most aquatic tropical insects (COVICH, 1988) and the great adaptability to local conditions of the most abundant taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Previous work has shown that the functional feeding groups in neotropical rivers are difficult to assign because taxa commonly use at least two trophic levels (TOMANOVA et al, 2006;WANTZEN and WAGNER, 2006;TOMANOVA et al, 2007). Even though the community structure of the Piburja stream was generally similar to those reported in previous work on Andean rivers (TURCOTTE and HARPER, 1982;FLECKER and FEIFAREK, 1994;JACOB-SEN and ENCALADA, 1998), we found important differences in feeding habits when comparing the gut content analysis of those same insect taxa of Bolivia Andean ranges (TOMANOVA et al, 2006). This may be related to the plasticity of feeding habits of most aquatic tropical insects (COVICH, 1988) and the great adaptability to local conditions of the most abundant taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Synchronicity in life cycles of some aquatic insects might be present in certain tropical areas with strong environmental seasonal changes in response to more favorable developmental conditions. Although there is evidence of synchronized life cycles in other tropical streams (JACKSON and SWEENEY, 1995), most tropical aquatic insects are present in different stages at the same time throughout the year (TURCOTTE and HARPER, 1982;JACKSON and SWEENEY, 1995). However, some studies have shown that Elmids, such as Macrelmis, have long life cycles that could last four years in rivers (STEEDMAN and ANDERSON, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In temperate streams, such temporal changes in distribution may be due to changing habitat and food preferences during the life cycles of aquatic insects (Minshall, 1984). However, most aquatic invertebrates in tropical streams (Hynes, 1975;Jackson & Sweeney, 1995;Yule & Pearson, 1996) including invertebrates in Ecuadorian highland streams (Turcotte & Harper, 1982) have asynchronised life cycles, so this high temporal variability in relationships (e.g. regression slopes) is probably related to disturbance events and a continuous redistribution of the fauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%