2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-0545-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporally variable macroinvertebrate–stone relationships in streams

Abstract: Stones were used to sample macroinvertebrates and characterise microhabitats at monthly or bimonthly intervals in six Ecuadorian streams covering a gradient in four different stability measures and other stream characteristics. The physical variables current velocity, water depth, horizontal position, embeddedness and size were measured to characterise stone microhabitats and presumed to be affected by or related to physical impact during hydrological disturbances. My first objective was to analyse how density… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of this, community metrics values were higher for stones located in fast-velocity areas. This has also been reported for stone-fauna experiments in Australia (Downes et al 1995) and in the high Andean streams of Ecuador (Jacobsen 2005). The degree of stone upturn was only important to a few taxa such as Podonominae and Simuliidae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As a consequence of this, community metrics values were higher for stones located in fast-velocity areas. This has also been reported for stone-fauna experiments in Australia (Downes et al 1995) and in the high Andean streams of Ecuador (Jacobsen 2005). The degree of stone upturn was only important to a few taxa such as Podonominae and Simuliidae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…According to Flecker and Feifarek (1994) and Jacobsen (2005Jacobsen ( , 2008, the macroinvertebrate assemblages in tropical rivers are conditioned mainly by the flow regime and hydrological disturbance, which affect the stability of the substrate, the drift process and the availability of allochthonous resources, with drift being generally aseasonal (Ramirez and Pringle, 1998;Rodriguez-Barrios et al, 2007). In a Neotropical stream of the Bolivian Andes, Tomanova et al (2006) and Tomanova (2007) concluded that macroinvertebrate communities respond according to the Habitat Templet Theory (Southwood, 1977;Townsend, 1989;Townsend and Hildrew, 1994), establishing a close relationship between environmental conditions of habitat and the biological traits (adaptations) of taxa that live in this habitat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tropical streams, several studies have examined the influence of stream flow on the seasonal variations of invertebrate communities (Hynes, 1975;Dudgeon, 1993;Flecker and Feifarek, 1994;Cressa, 1998;Jacobsen and Encalada, 1998;Ramirez and Pringle 1998), and the importance of hydrological disturbance in tropical mountain streams has been suggested by Jacobsen (2005), Tomanova et al (2006), Tomanova (2007) and Ríos-Touma et al (2011). In Colombia, studies on macroinvertebrate assemblages focus on issues such as the taxonomic diversity and/or their role as indicators of water quality (Roldan, 1988;Álvarez, 2005;Álvarez et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the rainy period, water flow may be irregular (Rivera and Donato, 2008) and N o n -c o m m e r c i a l u s e o n l y episodic spates can occur. The intensity of spates during the rainy period is associated with the rainfall frequency and local topography; it may affect streambed stability, turbidity and the mobility of the substrata (Jacobsen, 2005(Jacobsen, , 2008. Such hydrological variability is associated with changes in factors involved with the flow, such as the water speed and depth, and constitutes a disturbance that triggers changes in the phycoperiphyton assemblage and its succession due to their small size, passive dispersal method and generally limited mobility (Connell, 1978;Townsend, 1989;Winemiller et al, 2010, Passy, 2007Algarte et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%