1987
DOI: 10.1121/1.395526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lower limit of detectable sound pressures

Abstract: The electronic thermal noise in a classical condenser microphone and the associated preamplifier has been studied experimentally and theoretically. A new method was used to compute the electronic noise in the microphone. It is shown that the electronic noise in some microphones dominates the noise in the preamplifier. Therefore, the lowest sound pressure that may be detected by those microphones is determined by the thermal noise in the condenser microphones alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of perforation for such structureswhich directly affects damping and thermal noise levels 2 -is limited by capacitance requirements. 3,12 The structure presented in Fig. 3, in contrast, consists of mostly open area and therefore very small active capacitance.…”
Section: Micromachined Optical Microphone Structuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of perforation for such structureswhich directly affects damping and thermal noise levels 2 -is limited by capacitance requirements. 3,12 The structure presented in Fig. 3, in contrast, consists of mostly open area and therefore very small active capacitance.…”
Section: Micromachined Optical Microphone Structuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This attribute allows for the use of innovative microphone backplate designs with minimal area and low squeeze-film resistance-the dominant damping mechanism and thermalmechanical noise source in condenser microphones. 2,3 This feature may enable microphones with size characteristic of the smallest microphones demonstrated to date ͑with the essential semiconductor components contained within approximately 1.5 mm 3 volume͒, but with detection performance characteristic of the highest precision measurement microphones ͓below 20 dB͑A͒ noise levels͔. Single element microphones with this property may be useful for noninvasive instrumentation applications and audio applications where covertness is desired, while microfabricated arrays may be ideally suited for broadband sound intensity measurements and advanced speech recognition applications utilizing ambient noise suppression algorithms designed for miniature acoustic apertures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The total rms noise of the silicon microphones has been measured at a bias voltage of 28 V and amounts to 4.1 pV(A), or an equivalent sound pressure of 43 dB(A). As expected, it is a combination of an electrical l/f noise due to the preamplifier and a white mechanical-thermal noise from the sensor element itself [24]. The electrical noise may be obtained by replacing the microphone with a capacitor or by switching off the bias voltage.…”
Section: Measured (Dashed Curve) and Calculated (Solid Curves) Sensitmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 (left) shows the measured noise and calculated thermal-mechanical noise at x = 0 (bridge center) from a bridge with l = 200 µm. The measurements are made with a spectrum analyzer, and the displacement magnitude is calibrated using Equation 3. The data is fit to the n = 0 term of Equation 12 to obtain ν 0 and τ 0 , which are then substituted into Equation 12 for the calculated thermal-mechanical noise spectrum.…”
Section: Thermal-mechanical Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal-mechanical noise has previously been documented in systems such as mirror galvanometers, 2 microphones, 3 and scanning force microscopy probes , 4 and results from the same physical mechanisms that give rise to Brownian motion in liquids and Johnson noise in resistors. Recent measurements have demonstrated that the thermodynamics of microscopic systems are quite distinct from their macroscopic counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%