2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2815374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long-Run Effects of Teacher Collective Bargaining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moe (2009), Marianno and Strunk (2018), and Strunk and McEachin (2011) found that more restrictive collective bargaining agreements were associated with null to negative effects on student outcomes in California. More recently, Baron (2018) found evidence from Wisconsin's Act 10 to suggest that teachers’ unions reduced average test scores by 20 percent, and Lovenheim and Willén (2019) found that exposure to duty‐to‐bargain laws reduced annual earnings by 3.93 percent and hours worked per week by 0.42 for men. However, Matsudaira and Patterson (2017) found that teacher unionization in California charter schools increased math achievement by 17 percent but had no effects on reading achievement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moe (2009), Marianno and Strunk (2018), and Strunk and McEachin (2011) found that more restrictive collective bargaining agreements were associated with null to negative effects on student outcomes in California. More recently, Baron (2018) found evidence from Wisconsin's Act 10 to suggest that teachers’ unions reduced average test scores by 20 percent, and Lovenheim and Willén (2019) found that exposure to duty‐to‐bargain laws reduced annual earnings by 3.93 percent and hours worked per week by 0.42 for men. However, Matsudaira and Patterson (2017) found that teacher unionization in California charter schools increased math achievement by 17 percent but had no effects on reading achievement.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at teachers’ unions influence broadly, several studies have leveraged wholesale changes to collective bargaining rules to find either positive or negative impacts for students dependent upon the methodology and the outcomes of interest. Lovenheim and Willén (2019) found improved long-term outcomes for students in states with weaker unions; exposure to duty-to-bargain laws decreased male students’ earnings by nearly 4%. But to give one counterexample, Brunner et al (2019) demonstrated that in the aftermath of state finance reforms, unionized districts improved student achievement at a greater rate than non-unionized districts.…”
Section: Teachers’ Unions Contracts and Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Teachers' unions have the ability to shape teacher quality as well as students' short-term and long-term outcomes, including test scores, workforce participation, and earnings (Biasi, 2018;Brunner et al, 2019;Lovenheim & Willén, 2019). Looking at teachers' unions influence broadly, several studies have leveraged wholesale changes to collective bargaining rules to find either positive or negative impacts for students dependent upon the methodology and the outcomes of interest.…”
Section: Teachers' Unions Contracts and Student Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keefe (2018) finds that male union teachers face a 25 per cent wage penalty, whereas female union teachers obtain a small wage premium when compared to similarly educated and experienced non‐teachers. Lovenheim and Willén (2019) also find that the effects of CB law exposure on teachers’ labour market and educational attainment outcomes greatly differ by gender. Han (2020b) finds that the teacher wage penalty is much greater for male teachers than for female teachers, and that union‐friendly states show a smaller teacher wage penalty compared to anti‐union states.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%