2021
DOI: 10.1177/08959048211006859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partisan Predictors for Collective Bargaining Agreement Items

Abstract: The United States is rare among nations in its highly decentralized process for negotiating collective bargaining agreements with local teachers’ unions. To determine whether partisanship can predict these highly localized decisions, I construct an original database of Pennsylvania collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) merged with publicly available voter registration records to predict the presence of high-profile contract items. Using spatial autoregression and probit regression, I reveal that the partisan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the year of passage for each state as well as the set of states without such a law. 5 Of the 17 non-DTB states, 10 allow teachers to collectively bargain if both sides agree to do so. Four states (Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia) have no state law governing teacher collective bargaining, while three states (Mississippi, Missouri, and Wyoming) outlaw collective bargaining.…”
Section: A Duty-to-bargain Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the year of passage for each state as well as the set of states without such a law. 5 Of the 17 non-DTB states, 10 allow teachers to collectively bargain if both sides agree to do so. Four states (Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia) have no state law governing teacher collective bargaining, while three states (Mississippi, Missouri, and Wyoming) outlaw collective bargaining.…”
Section: A Duty-to-bargain Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%