1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00070-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long lasting effects of electrical simulation of the medial preoptic area and medial amygdala on maternal behavior in female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of rats have shown that the MPOA was most necessary for the occurrence of the active components of maternal behavior, especially retrieval (Franz et al, 1986;Jakubowski and Terkel, 1986;Numan et al, 1988;Numan, 1990;Lee and Brown, 2002). The reported findings showing that MPOA damage disrupted the operant bar-press response using pups as a rewarding stimulus in rats (Lee et al, 1999), that the preference for a pup-associated cue was enhanced by the electrical stimulation of the MPOA (Morgan et al, 1997(Morgan et al, , 1999, and that temporary inactivation of the MPOA disrupted maternal behavior in postpartum ewes (Perrin et al, 2007) suggest that the MPOA is involved in the general motivation for the maternal behavior rather than in a neural circuit that specifically regulates the retrieval response (Pereira et al, 2008;Numan and Stolzenberg, 2009;Numan and Woodside, 2010). It is most likely that the infanticide observed in this study was induced by the loss of maternal motivation caused by the MPOA damage.…”
Section: Maternal Motivation and Infanticide In Laboratory Micementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies of rats have shown that the MPOA was most necessary for the occurrence of the active components of maternal behavior, especially retrieval (Franz et al, 1986;Jakubowski and Terkel, 1986;Numan et al, 1988;Numan, 1990;Lee and Brown, 2002). The reported findings showing that MPOA damage disrupted the operant bar-press response using pups as a rewarding stimulus in rats (Lee et al, 1999), that the preference for a pup-associated cue was enhanced by the electrical stimulation of the MPOA (Morgan et al, 1997(Morgan et al, , 1999, and that temporary inactivation of the MPOA disrupted maternal behavior in postpartum ewes (Perrin et al, 2007) suggest that the MPOA is involved in the general motivation for the maternal behavior rather than in a neural circuit that specifically regulates the retrieval response (Pereira et al, 2008;Numan and Stolzenberg, 2009;Numan and Woodside, 2010). It is most likely that the infanticide observed in this study was induced by the loss of maternal motivation caused by the MPOA damage.…”
Section: Maternal Motivation and Infanticide In Laboratory Micementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second, expression of c-Fos and FosB proteins, markers of transcriptionally activated neurons, are induced in MPOA neurons during maternal behavior in rats and mice (Calamandrei and Keverne, 1994;Fleming et al, 1994;Numan and Numan, 1994;Brown et al, 1996;Lin et al, 1998a), and c-Fos expression in response to a pup-associated cue is elevated in MPOA neurons even in the absence of pups (Mattson and Morrell, 2005). Third, electrical stimulation on the MPOA facilitates maternal behavior and preference for pup-associated cues (Morgan et al, 1997(Morgan et al, , 1999. Lastly, the MPOA is known to be involved in the hormone-induced peripartum facilitation of maternal behavior in rats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that not only did animals with AMYG lesions have the shortest latency to become maternal, but that they were also less`f earful'' in open-®eld and Y-maze tests, as compared to other groups. Recent work in which maternally experienced females received electrical stimulation of the AMYG, showed the opposite effects: animals took longer to show maternal behavior and were more emotional than non-stimulated controls (Morgan, Watchus, Milgram, and Fleming, 1999). These results suggest that animals receiving AMYG lesions are less neophobic than controls, and thus less fearful of pups as a novel stimulus; in contrast, electrical stimulation of these sites produces the opposite effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…First, each of the nodes has been implicated in the control of multiple forms of social behavior. These include aggression, appetitive and consummatory sexual behavior, various forms of communication, social recognition, affiliation, bonding, parental behavior and responses to social stressors (Kirkpatrick et al, 1994;Kollack-Walker and Newman, 1995;Bamshad and Albers, 1996;Coolen et al, 1997;Kollack-Walker et al, 1997;Wang et al, 1997;Lonstein et al, 1998;Morgan et al, 1999;Delville et al, 2000;Kalinichev et al, 2000;Gammie and Nelson, 2001;Heeb and Yahr, 2001;Sheehan et al, 2001;Ferguson et al, 2002;Cushing et al, 2003;Lim and Young, 2004). The nodes are also bidirectionally connected (Risold and Swanson, 1997b;Coolen and Wood, 1998;Dong and Swanson, 2004), and each area contains sex steroid receptors that are essential for the sexual differentiation and temporal coordination of social behavior (Morrell and Pfaff, 1978;Commins and Yahr, 1985;Simerly et al, 1990;Wood and Newman, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%