“…Although “traditional” predictive models deliver exactly what they are designed to do (predictive models primarily based on environmental variables), there is an increasing demand from the archaeological community for more explanatory models. In order for predictive modeling to meet these new demands and remain relevant for archaeology, new methods, concepts, and theories need to be developed (Verhagen & Jeneson, ; Verhagen et al., 2013a, ; Whitley & Burns, ). Whereas the recent debate on modeling accessibility has largely focused on correctly defining different cost‐surface modules such as friction layers, least‐cost paths, and viewshed analyses, the actual application of cultural integrated models has been limited (Herzog, ; Herzog, , , ; Murrieta‐Flores, 2012; Verhagen, ; Zakšek et al., ).…”