2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-005-0560-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I should also warn the reader that I henceforth employ (both first-order and propositional) plural logic without shame, but will explain the basics along the way. For more details on first-order plural logic, see Boolos (1986), Yi (2005Yi ( , 2006 or Oliver and Smiley (2013). 7 Following Rosen (2010), I here assume the so-called predicate approach rather than the so-called operator approach, and I assume that grounding is factive.…”
Section: Pannormismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I should also warn the reader that I henceforth employ (both first-order and propositional) plural logic without shame, but will explain the basics along the way. For more details on first-order plural logic, see Boolos (1986), Yi (2005Yi ( , 2006 or Oliver and Smiley (2013). 7 Following Rosen (2010), I here assume the so-called predicate approach rather than the so-called operator approach, and I assume that grounding is factive.…”
Section: Pannormismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation is formalized in (8) making use of plural logic (Yi 2005(Yi 2006 Oliver/Smiley 2013), with 'xx', 'yy', 'zz' being plural variables that are able to stand for several things at once, < being the relation is/are among, and TWO and FOUR being plural predicates that are true of two things and four things (respectively) at once:…”
Section: Semantic Evidence For the Adjectival Strategy For Number Wormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schein (1993Schein ( , 2006, Oliver & Smiley (2001), Rayo (2002Rayo ( , 2006, Yi (2005), and McKay (2006). 13 For lack of space, we present here only two of these arguments, under the form of a dilemma.…”
Section: The Dilemma For Plurals 31 the Dilemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So plurals should not be represented in predicate logic. An attractive alternative is offered by plural logic (see Rayo 2002, Oliver & Smiley 2006, Yi 2005, McKay 2006, Linnebo 2008, and Linnebo & Nicolas 2008. 19 Plural logic possesses plural constants and variables, which may be interpreted as one or several individuals of the domain of interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%