1978
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91021-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The locus coeruleus noradrenergic system — evidence against a role in attention, habituation, anxiety and motor activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with these findings, ablation of the LC in rodents leads to an increase in fear responses to novelty (Delini-Stula, et al, 1984; Koob, et al, 1984; Itoi and Sugimoto, 2010; Mason and Fibiger, 1979), or no change in social contacts during novelty (Crow, et al, 1978), and increasing LC activation decreases anxious behavior in the open field test (Weiss et al, 1994). These findings suggest that LC activity may help reduce anxiety in at least some contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast with these findings, ablation of the LC in rodents leads to an increase in fear responses to novelty (Delini-Stula, et al, 1984; Koob, et al, 1984; Itoi and Sugimoto, 2010; Mason and Fibiger, 1979), or no change in social contacts during novelty (Crow, et al, 1978), and increasing LC activation decreases anxious behavior in the open field test (Weiss et al, 1994). These findings suggest that LC activity may help reduce anxiety in at least some contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While disruption of the NE systems in the brain or stimulation of these systems by various means can affect such behaviors as motor activity (Stone and Mendlinger, 1974;Geyer et al, 1972;Carey, 1976), investigatory activity (Delini-Stula et al, 1984), social interaction (Eison et al, 1977), and sleep (Kaitin et al, 1986), the effects seen are generally small, variable, and depend on specific testing conditions (see, for example, Amaral and Sinnamon, 1977;Mason, 1981;Robinson et al, 1977;Crow et al, 1978;Carli et al, 1983;Robbins et al, 1985). To some extent, this conclusion may be influenced by less-than-optimal methodology (i.e., the most-utilized technique is the making of lesions [including use of neurotoxins] which does not produce altered N E activity but produces nonphysiological destruction of the system); nevertheless, the overall conclusion indicated by a considerable body of work is that experimental manipulation of brain N E does not influence depression-related responses profoundly or directly.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewing basic research relating symptoms of depression to changes in noradrenergic activity in the brain reveals that experimental alterations in brain NE can affect behaviors such as motor activity, investigatory behavior, social interaction, and sleep (e.g., Stone and Medlinger, 1974; Carey, 1976; Delini-Stula et al, 1984; Eison et al, 1977; Kaitin et al, 1986), but the changes in these behaviors resulting from profound perturbations of NE are often small, variable, and depend upon specific testing conditions for changes to be seen (e.g., Amaral and Sinnamon, 1977; Carli et al, 1983; Crow et al, 1978; Robbins et al, 1989; Robinson et al, 1977). In contrast, alteration of brain dopamine (DA) appears to have much more impact on behaviors related to depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%