The article by Paul Willner surveying the chronic mild stress model of depression provides an opportunity not only to review this model but also to place it in an overall context. Research on this model, which was initially developed by Richard Katz in association with Bernard Carroll and others at the University of Michigan (Katz et al. 1981;Katz 1982), has been vigorously pursued over the past 10 years by Willner and his colleagues, and represents a significant aspect of attempts to model important processes in depression with rodents undertaken in the last decade. Willner is to be commended for presenting his review to a commentary forum so that the model can be scrutinized.The fundamental finding on which the model is based, and against which therapeutic effects of various drugs have been assessed, is that animals subjected to a variety of stressors (referred to as the chronic mild stress procedure) show decreased intake of a palatable sucrose solution. Willner's initial contention, oft-repeated in the numerous studies that the group has published, is that this decrease in sucrose intake represents a loss of preference for the palatable sucrose solution, and, based on this loss of preference, is indicative of anhedonia. This commentator has never felt that the data he has seen generated by this model indicate a loss of preference for sucrose, and has stated this in reviewing the model (Weiss and Kilts 1995). In every study of which I am aware, the stressed animals may decrease their intake of sucrose, but they continue to consume considerably more sucrose solution than water; i.e., they never lose their preference for the sucrose solution in comparison to water. Moreover, in those few studies that have attempted to show a change in preference, preference is analyzed by showing that sucrose consumption decreases in relation to the amount of water consumed. But for this index to be valid, one must be confident that water intake is susceptible to being decreased as readily as is sucrose intake. The problem here is that the amount of water consumed in all conditions is so low that one does not know that this low level of intake does not represent some sort of basal, "floor" level of water intake that is quite resistant to being decreased, and therefore cannot be used to construct any valid index of preference. But this having been said, what the model does show is that, as a consequence of the chronic mild stress procedure, an animal will decrease the amount of sucrose solution that it will consume. If one considers that a stressed animal is demonstrating a decrease in its consummatory behavior, even consummatory behavior stimulated by the availability of a palatable substance, the phenomenon can be placed in a long-known historical context in which animals decrease their consummatory behavior when exposed to stressful conditions; studies showing this have been evident from the early 1960s (e.g., Brady et al. 1962;Pare 1964Pare , 1965.Having said this, this commentator finds the discussion in Willner's review rel...