2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The location and evolution of the tectonic boundary between the Paleoproterozoic Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt and the Longgang Block, northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The North China craton (also referred to as the Sino‐Korean craton or platform in the literature) is bounded to the southwest by the early Paleozoic Qilian orogen (e.g., Song et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu, Zuza, et al, ; Xiao et al, ; Zuza et al, ), to the north by the late Paleozoic Central Asian Orogenic Belt (Kröner et al, ; Wu, Wang, et al, ; Xiao et al, ), to the east by the Mesozoic Su‐Lu and Jiao‐Liao‐Ji orogen belt (Pei et al, ; C. Peng et al, ; Yang et al, ; Wu et al, ), and to the south by the Mesozoic Qinling‐Dabie Shan orogen (Figure ). The craton is divided into several different tectonic units, which traditionally consists of two major Archean‐Proterozoic blocks (i.e., the Eastern and Western blocks) separated by the intervening ~1,500‐km‐long north trending Neoarchean‐Paleoproterozoic Central Orogenic Belt (Figure ; Kusky & Li, ; Kusky et al, , ; Meert & Santosh, ; C. Peng et al, ; P. Peng et al, ; Santosh, ; Wang et al, , ; Zhai, , ; Zhai & Liu, ; Zhai & Peng, ; Zhai & Santosh, ; Zhai et al, , , ) The Eastern block contains 3.8‐ to 2.6‐Ga gneiss and greenstone belts overlain by 2.6‐ to 2.5‐Ga metasedimentary cover, which is made up of the Longgang and Nangrim blocks that joined along the Paleoproterozoic Jiao‐Liao‐Ji deformed volcano‐sedimentary belt (Figure ; e.g., Kusky et al, ; Tam et al, ; Zhao et al, ). The cratonic destruction of the eastern part of the craton was resulted from the root loss of the subcontinental lithosphere in the Mesozoic (Gao et al, ; Kusky et al, ; Zhai et al, ).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The North China craton (also referred to as the Sino‐Korean craton or platform in the literature) is bounded to the southwest by the early Paleozoic Qilian orogen (e.g., Song et al, ; Wu et al, ; Wu, Zuza, et al, ; Xiao et al, ; Zuza et al, ), to the north by the late Paleozoic Central Asian Orogenic Belt (Kröner et al, ; Wu, Wang, et al, ; Xiao et al, ), to the east by the Mesozoic Su‐Lu and Jiao‐Liao‐Ji orogen belt (Pei et al, ; C. Peng et al, ; Yang et al, ; Wu et al, ), and to the south by the Mesozoic Qinling‐Dabie Shan orogen (Figure ). The craton is divided into several different tectonic units, which traditionally consists of two major Archean‐Proterozoic blocks (i.e., the Eastern and Western blocks) separated by the intervening ~1,500‐km‐long north trending Neoarchean‐Paleoproterozoic Central Orogenic Belt (Figure ; Kusky & Li, ; Kusky et al, , ; Meert & Santosh, ; C. Peng et al, ; P. Peng et al, ; Santosh, ; Wang et al, , ; Zhai, , ; Zhai & Liu, ; Zhai & Peng, ; Zhai & Santosh, ; Zhai et al, , , ) The Eastern block contains 3.8‐ to 2.6‐Ga gneiss and greenstone belts overlain by 2.6‐ to 2.5‐Ga metasedimentary cover, which is made up of the Longgang and Nangrim blocks that joined along the Paleoproterozoic Jiao‐Liao‐Ji deformed volcano‐sedimentary belt (Figure ; e.g., Kusky et al, ; Tam et al, ; Zhao et al, ). The cratonic destruction of the eastern part of the craton was resulted from the root loss of the subcontinental lithosphere in the Mesozoic (Gao et al, ; Kusky et al, ; Zhai et al, ).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we used data (Table 2) Table 3). We also summarised the physical characteristics of the strata and intrusive rocks (Li and Chen 2013;Peng et al 2016a;Table 4), revealing that the resistivity of the intrusive rocks is generally higher than that of the sedimentary rocks and that the density of the intrusive rocks is generally lower than that of the sedimentary rocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has undergone a complex tectonic evolution, including uplift, subsidence, arching and rifting, with metamorphism and deformation at different scales within the rift, as well as the formation of complex folds and deepseated faults (Lu et al 1998;Zhao et al 2001Zhao et al , 2005Zhao 2009;Li et al 2006;Wan et al 2006;Lu et al 2006;Tam et al 2011;Meng et al 2013). Repeated, intense episodes of magmatism in the Liao Ji rift produced large intrusive rock masses, with intense hydrothermal-exhalation along deep-seated faults (Zhao et al 2001(Zhao et al , 2005Zhao 2009;Li et al 2005Li et al , 2006Li et al , 2011Li et al , 2012Zhao et al 2012;Zhao and Zhai 2013;Peng et al 2016a). The region is rich in geothermal resources, with measured geothermal water temperatures and flow rates of up to 70 °C and 4 kg/s (Zhong and Xiao 1990; Table 1).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gyeonggi Massif in South Korea is bounded by the Palaeozoic Imjingang fold-thrust belt to the north and the late Precambrian-Palaeozoic Ogcheon (Okcheon) fold-thrust belt to the south. The Jiao-Liao-Ji belt in the eastern NCC is a Paleoproterozoic orogenic belt (Figure 1) that is considered to mark the collision between the Longgang Block of the NCC and the Nangrim Massif in North Korea (Peng et al, 2016;Yuan et al, 2015). The northern Gyeonggi Massif is dominated by Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks that underwent intermediate-P/T-type metamorphism at c. 1.93-1.91 Ga and high-T metamorphism at c. 1.88-1.85 Ga with intrusion of 1.87-1.85 Ga granitoids (e.g.…”
Section: The Correlation Of the Oki Belt To The Precambrian Blocks In...mentioning
confidence: 99%