2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x14000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of Judicial Independence: A Model with Illustration from Venezuela under Chávez

Abstract: This paper presents a heuristic model of judicial independence that illustrates how it is that changes in de facto judicial independence may occur, even in the absence of overt institutional changes in de jure protections. The model is illustrated by the marked decline in the independence of Venezuela's high court between 1998 and 2010, under President Hugo Chávez. Focusing on the trade-off that courts face between jurisprudential change and policy change, the paper demonstrates how courts – even those that cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the interplay between agencies and across branches of government, autonomy is therefore politically determined. As a result, the common practice of arguing that autonomy is solely the result of formal institutional protections, such as budgetary independence, appointment procedures, or mechanisms of policy review, has been shown to be inadequate (Taylor, 2014).…”
Section: Institutional Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the interplay between agencies and across branches of government, autonomy is therefore politically determined. As a result, the common practice of arguing that autonomy is solely the result of formal institutional protections, such as budgetary independence, appointment procedures, or mechanisms of policy review, has been shown to be inadequate (Taylor, 2014).…”
Section: Institutional Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic model of central bank independence can be found in Eijffinger and Hoeberichts (2002). An application of the model to courts can be found in Taylor (2014). economy or specific aspects of national development.…”
Section: De Facto Protectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these features are not exhaustive, they are essential to the proper functioning of any agency (see Domingo 2000;Taylor 2014). The rules guiding appointment and tenure could present ombudsmen with greater freedom from the executive, as they do with a variety of other government agencies in democratic settings (Domingo 2000;Dull and Roberts 2009;McCarty 2004).…”
Section: Institutional Determinants Of Ombudsman Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part, this omission could be explained by the fact that the ombudsman is a nonsanctioning body. After all, if sanctioning authorities have proven themselves lackluster (see Rios‐Figeroa, ; Taylor, ; Taylor & Buranelli, ) when it comes to fighting corruption in the region, why should we expect an agency like the ombuds to do better?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%