The lichen family Parmeliaceae in Poland. II. The genus Cetrelia

Kukwa, Martin; Pietnoczko, Magdalena; Czyżewska, Krystyna

doi:10.5586/asbp.2012.007

Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Studied red-listed bryophyte and lichen taxa and their characteristics. Data compiled from the sources: Abolina (1968), Council Directive 92/43/EEK (1992), Āboliņa (1994), Andrušaitis et al (1996), LRMK (2000), Ek et al (2002), Motiejūnaitė (2005), Smith et al (2009), Kukwa et al (2012), LRMK (2012), Liepiņa (2017), Hodgetts et al (2019), Mark et al (2019), Degtjarenko & Moisejevs (2020), Hodgetts et al (2020). Continuous variable in interaction terms were mean-centered to make interaction comparable with other variables in a model.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%

The main drivers for the occurrence of six red-listed epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in the boreo-nemoral forest landscape, Latvia
Mežaka¹,
Moisejevs²,
Nitcis³
2021
Folia Cryptog. Estonica
4
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forest landscape plays a significant role in rare cryptogam distribution. However, data about the environmental demands of rare epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in boreo-nemoral forest landscapes are not complete. In this study, we focused on finding the main environmental predictors influencing the occurrence of three red-listed epiphytic bryophytes and three red-listed epiphytic lichens in the Latvian boreo-nemoral forest landscape. We obtained the records of species from the Natural Data Management System OZOLS database, which is a national information system on all rare taxa. We analyzed the occurrence of species in relation to forest stand age and area, forest type, heterogeneity and tree bark pH class. We found that selected red-listed bryophyte and lichen occurrence was mainly influenced by forest stand age and area. However, each of the red-listed epiphytic bryophyte and lichen has their own ecological demands in the boreo-nemoral landscape.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%

show abstract

“…All published data on lichens from this part of Poland are presented in Chapter 5, including those cited in work using thin-layer chromatography or molecular methods in taxonomic revisions of the following genera or species: Cetrelia (Kukwa et al 2012), Chrysothrix (Olszewska et al 2014), Cladonia (Kowalewska et al 2008, Syrek & Kukwa 2008, Osyczka 2009, Osyczka & Skubała 2011, Lecanora compallens, L. expallens, L. thysanophora, Lecidella flavosorediata, L. subviridis (Zduńczyk & Kukwa 2014), Lecanora semipallida (Śliwa 2009), Lepraria (Kukwa 2006), Micarea (Czarnota 2007), Montanelia (Szczepańska et al 2015), Ochrolechia (Kukwa 2011), Parmotrema (Jabłońska et al 2009), Peltigera (Miądlikowska 1999), Porpidia (Jabłońska 2012), Stereocaulon (Oset 2014), Verrucaria s. lat. (Krzewicka 2012), Xanthoparmelia pulla complex and Loxospora cristinae, described as a species new to science (Guzow-Krzemińska et al 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%

“…S. Cieśliński & K. Czyżewska (LOD L−14907). , 1976a, Hachułka (2005Hachułka ( , 2012, Kukwa et al (2012), Łubek (2012b).…”

Section: Cetraria Achunclassified

The lichenized, lichenicolous and other non-lichenized allied fungi of Central Poland. A catalogue
Czyżewska¹
2020
Self Cite
4
0
0
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to summarize knowledge about the lichen biota found so far in Central Poland, to collect all data for published and previously unpublished lichens, and to prepare a list of taxa occurring in this region. Lichenicolous fungi and non-lichenized fungi allied to lichens are also included in the catalogue. 2. Central Poland: study area The boundaries of the territory defined in this work as Central Poland are accepted conventionally and correspond to the spatial scope of lichenological research I conducted from 1966 to 2016. Within the accepted boundaries, Central Poland is located between Włocławek town (52°39′39″N, 19°04′07″E) and Płock city (52°32′50″N, 19°42′00″E) in the north; Częstochowa city (50°49′04″N, 19°08′18″E) and Włoszczowa town (50°51′15″N, 19°58′01″E) in the south; Ostrzeszów town (51°25′30″N, 17°55′47″E), Gołuchów village along with the Gołuchów Arboretum (51°51′48″N, 17°55′33″E) and Kalisz town (51°45′45″N, 18°05′23″E) in the west; and the Modrzewina nature reserve close to Grójec town (51°50′24″N, 20°46′28″E)-the northernmost site of the subendemic Polish larch-Skarżysko-Kamienna town (51°06′59″N, 20°52′01″E) and Pakosław village close to Iłża town along with the Pakosław peatland (51°11′30″N, 21°10′32″E) in the east. In the physico-geographical division of Kondracki (2002), Central Poland is located in 35 mesoregions and 10 macroregions belonging to two high-ranking units, the Niż Środkowoeuropejski lowland and Wyżyny Polskie upland provinces. Within the Niż Środkowoeuropejski lowland, areas in the Pojezierze Wielkopolskie lakeland (three mesoregions belonging to three macroregions) and Niziny Środkowopolskie lowlands (21 mesoregions belonging to four macroregions) subprovinces were investigated. Within the Wyżyny Polskie uplands province the research included the Wyżyna Śląsko-Krakowska upland (two mesoregions belonging to one macroregion) and Wyżyna Środkowomałopolska upland (nine mesoregions belonging to two macroregions) subprovinces. The names of mesoregions and macroregions are specified under Distribution in Chapter 5. Central Poland is situated in the borders of four historical lands, Wielkopolska, Mazovia, Ziemia Wieluńska and Małopolska. On the border Mazovia and Wielkopolska is Łódź, the largest city in this part of the country, a centre for many scientific institutions, including the University of Łódź. The border of two macroregions passing through Łódź clearly divides the city into two parts in terms of geomorphology. The northeastern part rises to 281 m a.s.l. and belongs to the Wzniesienia Południowomazowieckie heights macroregion, within it the Wzniesienia Łódzkie heights mesoregion; outside it the southeastern part of the city belongs to the Wysoczyzna Bełchatowska high plain. The western part of Łódź, located much lower (up to 163 m a.s.l.), belongs to the Nizina Południowowielkopolska lowland macroregion and the Wysoczyzna Łaska high plain mesoregion. Central Poland is an area transitional between lowlands and uplands, having three types of relief and l...

show abstract

“…The morphology, chemistry and general distribution of the species and discussion on allied taxa are provided. This paper is the third in the series dealing with lichens of the Parmeliaceae in Poland [20,21], and one of numerous designed to aid recognition of the country's lichen biota (e.g. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%

The lichen family Parmeliaceae in Poland. III. Parmelia serrana, new to Poland
Ossowska
¹
,
Szymczyk²,
Bohdan³
et al. 2014
Acta Soc Bot Pol
Self Cite
12
0
5
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parmelia serrana A. Crespo, M.C. Molina & D. Hawksw. is reported here for the first time from Poland. The species has been recorded from more than 20 localities and exclusively on the bark of trees. Its general distribution, habitat requirements, morphology, secondary chemistry are provided and the differences between this species and similar taxa, especially P. saxatilis and P. ernstiae, are discussed.

show abstract

The lichen family Parmeliaceae in Poland. II. The genus Cetrelia

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

The main drivers for the occurrence of six red-listed epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in the boreo-nemoral forest landscape, Latvia

The main drivers for the occurrence of six red-listed epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in the boreo-nemoral forest landscape, Latvia

The lichenized, lichenicolous and other non-lichenized allied fungi of Central Poland. A catalogue

The lichen family Parmeliaceae in Poland. III. Parmelia serrana, new to Poland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About