2015
DOI: 10.1075/veaw.g54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations on the complementation of light verb constructions are rather diverse. Some of them focus on the contribution of the light verb and the deverbal noun to the selection of complements (Huddleston, Pullum, 2010;Wittenberg, 2014;Bruening, 2015), while others deal with the variety of complements taken by different light verbs (Muk-herjee, 2010;Hoffman et al, 2011;Bernaisch, 2015), and yet others study complementation patterns of LVCs (Giparaitė, 2016). The latter research describes complementation patterns of LVCs in twenty English varieties and reveals that LVCs with the light verb have select the largest number of complement patterns and take complements in more English varieties under investigation than LVCs with the verbs get and give (ibid).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on the complementation of light verb constructions are rather diverse. Some of them focus on the contribution of the light verb and the deverbal noun to the selection of complements (Huddleston, Pullum, 2010;Wittenberg, 2014;Bruening, 2015), while others deal with the variety of complements taken by different light verbs (Muk-herjee, 2010;Hoffman et al, 2011;Bernaisch, 2015), and yet others study complementation patterns of LVCs (Giparaitė, 2016). The latter research describes complementation patterns of LVCs in twenty English varieties and reveals that LVCs with the light verb have select the largest number of complement patterns and take complements in more English varieties under investigation than LVCs with the verbs get and give (ibid).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to Schneider's (2003, 2007) model, which describes five phases of the evolution of postcolonial Englishes, previous research has found that SLE has passed – with differential perspectives for individual structural levels – the nativisation phase and now displays several characteristics of endonormative stabilisation (Bernaisch, 2015). However, British English (BrE) – the historical input variety – does not account for all linguistic influences on SLE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the latter, Hoffmann, Hundt, and Mukherjee () and Gries and Bernaisch () suggest that IndE, though heterogeneous in nature across the country, seems in some regards to exert epicentral influence and function as a model variety to SLE, for example in the domain of English‐language teaching. Yet, based on Schneider's (, ) model, which traces the different phases in the evolution of postcolonial Englishes, it has been suggested that SLE – at least concerning features of its lexicogrammar – has already passed through a phase of structural nativisation and currently displays many characteristics of an endonormatively stabilised (Bernaisch, ), yet semi‐autonomous variety (Mukherjee, , p. 182). Investigating the dis‐/similarities between the three varieties therefore provides a holistic picture in their given geohistorical context and elucidates whether the varieties have followed different paths of pragmatic development in regard to the use of filled and unfilled pauses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%