1999
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.10.1543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the "salmon bias" and healthy migrant hypotheses.

Abstract: Numerous studies have indicated that lower socioeconomic status (SES) is related to poor health, in terms of both morbidity and mortality. immortal,"''4(0"237) resulting in an artificially low Latino mortality rate.Although the salmon bias hypothesis has not been tested, some evidence suggests that it is plausible. One study'5 estimated return migration rates ofvarious foreign-born groups based on data from a program requiring immigrants to submit yearly address reports to the Immigration and Naturalization Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

29
690
5
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 945 publications
(742 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
29
690
5
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in both fields finds that being an immigrant or the child of one can lead to differential integration outcomes across several dimensions, including health (Abraido-Lanza et al, 1999;Viruell-Fuentes, 2007), education (Kao & Tienda, 1995;Suárez-Orozco & Suárez-Orozco, 2009), and overall life chances (Kasinitz et al, 2008;Portes & Rumbaut, 2006). Including parents' and donors' migration status in our analyses revealed the attributes' importance in discerning new configurations of donors, an occurrence previously untested in the U.S. context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in both fields finds that being an immigrant or the child of one can lead to differential integration outcomes across several dimensions, including health (Abraido-Lanza et al, 1999;Viruell-Fuentes, 2007), education (Kao & Tienda, 1995;Suárez-Orozco & Suárez-Orozco, 2009), and overall life chances (Kasinitz et al, 2008;Portes & Rumbaut, 2006). Including parents' and donors' migration status in our analyses revealed the attributes' importance in discerning new configurations of donors, an occurrence previously untested in the U.S. context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 One of the two previous studies examining Latino mortality and segregation did not include any adjustment for area level immigration status or individual level immigration. 33 We adjusted for percent foreign-born in our statistical models since foreign-born persons not only may have differential mortality patterns but also may influence and/or provide contextual factors that influence health and mortality. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In our study, adjusting for foreign-born status attenuated the effect of percent Latino race on mortality but most particularly in Latino women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the death certificates, decedents were classified as foreign born if they were born in any of the US territories (eg, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands) or other foreign countries listed, as has been done in previous literature exploring nativity status and mortality 26, 27, 28. In the 2000 and 2010 censuses, however, individuals self‐identified as US born if they were born within the 50 states or the District of Columbia or “outside the United States” including Puerto Rico, the US Island Areas, or abroad of American parents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%