2005
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Latest Trends In English Word-Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis certainly deserves further exploration. Perhaps we should leave open the possibility that the processes of word formation in psychology may be as many and various as they are in other settings (e.g., Szymanek, 2005). The reasons why each new word in any subject has the characteristics that it does may depend on the specific context in which the word is invented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis certainly deserves further exploration. Perhaps we should leave open the possibility that the processes of word formation in psychology may be as many and various as they are in other settings (e.g., Szymanek, 2005). The reasons why each new word in any subject has the characteristics that it does may depend on the specific context in which the word is invented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4), derivational under-marking occurs when parts of the base formal material are not present in the derived word. This is typical of word formation process types across languages, as the examples in English, French, Italian, and Dutch show: back-formation (12), blending (13), and cross-formation (14, 15); (on back-and cross-formation, see e.g.Adams 1981;Becker 1993;Nagano 2007;Shimamura 1983;Szymanek 2005; on blending, see Dressler 2000; Fradin 2000; Warren 1990 among others). DD n:1 also concerns derivation from a multi-lexical base, where only one part of this basis surfaces in the derivative (16)(Namer 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Despite the distinction established previously, lexicological process is now considered to be at least partially rule-related or rulegoverned (Hohenhaus, 2007). According to Szymanek (2005), one of the most significant elements of new advancements in the area of word-formation is the appearance of new complex terms formed according to some well-established and fruitful patterns. These derivational neologisms encompass key word-formation processes in use in English, such as affixation, compounding, conversion, and abbreviation.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%