2011
DOI: 10.1044/vvd21.3.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Laryngeal Epithelium in Reflux

Abstract: The epithelium plays a critical role in the maintenance of laryngeal health. This is evident in that laryngeal disease may result when the integrity of the epithelium is compromised by insults such as laryngopharyngeal reflux. In this article, we will review the structure and function of the laryngeal epithelium and summarize the impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on the epithelium. Research investigating the ramifications of reflux on the epithelium has improved our understanding of laryngeal disease associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings do not provide support for the earlier assertion that temperature may be an important variable to include in the theoretical construct of phonation threshold pressure; however, this investigation may not have provided enough of a passive or active thermal challenge to the upper airway to realize a difference in PTP. The lack of significant difference in PTP between mouth versus nose breathing in each environmental condition tested departs from early findings (Sivasankar et al, 2008; Sivasankar & Fisher, 2002) of lower PTP values with nose breathing; however, these findings are consistent with more recent data presented by the Sivasankar laboratory (Erickson-Levendoski & Sivasankar, 2011; Sundarrajan, et al, 2012). The difference in these findings may be attributed to participant selection differences and protocol scheduling considerations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings do not provide support for the earlier assertion that temperature may be an important variable to include in the theoretical construct of phonation threshold pressure; however, this investigation may not have provided enough of a passive or active thermal challenge to the upper airway to realize a difference in PTP. The lack of significant difference in PTP between mouth versus nose breathing in each environmental condition tested departs from early findings (Sivasankar et al, 2008; Sivasankar & Fisher, 2002) of lower PTP values with nose breathing; however, these findings are consistent with more recent data presented by the Sivasankar laboratory (Erickson-Levendoski & Sivasankar, 2011; Sundarrajan, et al, 2012). The difference in these findings may be attributed to participant selection differences and protocol scheduling considerations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These conditions and many of the medications taken for these conditions may interrupt the physiology of laryngeal epithelial health as demonstrated in recent basic research (Erickson-Levendoski & Sivasankar, 2011). The potential variability of the measurement of PTP was reduced through careful and repeated training of the task protocol as well as careful maintenance of task elicitation parameters within and between test conditions for each volunteer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation