2020
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amaa029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language of Evaluation in the Narratives by the Magdalene Laundries Survivors: The Discourse of Female Victimhood

Abstract: Drawing on Martin and White’s Appraisal Theory, we study the language of evaluation in a corpus of interviews selected from the archives of The Magdalene Oral History Project. Apart from being deprived of proper food, clothing, and their identity, many of the women who spent their lives in Ireland’s Magdalene institutions had been, or were, sexually assaulted, and physically and psychologically abused. Their criminalization led them to long-lasting incarceration for no apparent reason and, years further on, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means the analysis is systematic (Baker et al 2008;Gries & Berez 2017;McEnery & Hardie 2012;Partington et al 2013). In this sense, CL is very useful for a critical discourse analysis (Baker 2006(Baker , 2009(Baker , 2010a(Baker , 2010bHidalgo Tenorio & Benítez Castro 2020) due to the objectivity of this method to study how language is used, as Gabrielatos and Baker (2008: 7) make clear: 36 Corpus linguistics methodology allows for a higher degree of objectivity-that is, it enables the researcher to approach the texts (relatively) free from any preconceived notions regarding their linguistic or semantic/pragmatic content. When the starting point is keyword analysis, the analyst is presented with a list of words/clusters which will then be examined in (expanded) concordances for their patterning and contextual use.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the analysis is systematic (Baker et al 2008;Gries & Berez 2017;McEnery & Hardie 2012;Partington et al 2013). In this sense, CL is very useful for a critical discourse analysis (Baker 2006(Baker , 2009(Baker , 2010a(Baker , 2010bHidalgo Tenorio & Benítez Castro 2020) due to the objectivity of this method to study how language is used, as Gabrielatos and Baker (2008: 7) make clear: 36 Corpus linguistics methodology allows for a higher degree of objectivity-that is, it enables the researcher to approach the texts (relatively) free from any preconceived notions regarding their linguistic or semantic/pragmatic content. When the starting point is keyword analysis, the analyst is presented with a list of words/clusters which will then be examined in (expanded) concordances for their patterning and contextual use.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may involve borrowing insights from trauma studies (Fassin & Rechtman, 2009; Ring et al, 2022) and linguistics (Hidalgo-Tenorio & Benítez-Castro, 2021) to consider the intergenerational effects of past wrongs, and including families in the category of victim. It may involve amplifying the voices of survivors who do dare to speak publicly about their experiences.…”
Section: Criminology Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Fuoli and Hommerberg (2015) andFuoli (2018) for a discussion on the design of a clear annotation scheme and intra-and inter-reliability checks to diminish subjectivity in the evaluation analysis, and an application at Hidalgo-Tenorio and Benítez-Castro (2020Castro ( , 2021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%