The Language of End-of-Life Decision Making: A Simulation Study

Abstract

Background: Framing is known to influence decision making. Objective: The study objective was to describe language used by physicians when discussing treatment options with a critically and terminally ill elder. Methods: High-fidelity simulation was used, involving an elder with end-stage cancer and life-threatening hypoxia, followed by a debriefing interview. Subjects were hospitalist, emergency medicine, and critical care physicians from three academic medical centers. Measures were observation of encounters in real time followed by content analysis of simulation and debriefing interview transcripts. During the simulation we identified the first mention (''broaching'') of principal treatment options-intubation and mechanical ventilation (lifesustaining treatment [LST]) and palliation in anticipation of death (palliation)-and used constant comparative methods to identify language used. We identified physician opinions about the use of LST in this clinical context during the debriefing interviews, and compared language used with opinions. Results: Among 114 physician subjects, 106 discussed LST, 86 discussed palliation, and 84 discussed both. We identified five frames: will (decided), must (necessary), should (convention), could (option), and ask (elicitation of preferences). Physicians broached LST differently than palliation ( p < 0.01), most commonly framing LST as necessary (53%), while framing palliation as optional (49%). Among physicians who framed LST as imperative (will or must), 16 (30%) felt intubation would be inappropriate in this clinical situation. Conclusions: In this high-fidelity simulation experiment involving a critically and terminally ill elder, the majority of physicians framed the available options in ways implying LST was the expected or preferred choice. Framing of treatment options could influence ultimate treatment decisions.

Understanding Factors Contributing to Inappropriate Critical Care: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Record Documentation

“…Indeed, the language used to frame treatment options has been shown to influence treatment decisions. 25 This finding is also consistent with a prior study that found that a high-intensity medical center, compared with a lower intensity facility, was more likely to offer open-ended trials of life-sustaining treatments without addressing long-term goals. 26 Our study has several limitations.…”

Simulation training in palliative care: state of the art and future directions

“…A third study included hospitalist, EM, and critical care physicians in a technologically advanced robotic simulation with a family member of a critically ill patient. Participants broached life-sustaining treatment differently than treatment focusing on comfort, commonly framing life-sustaining treatment as necessary while framing comfort measures as optional 42. These studies demonstrate that SBME allows researchers to investigate communication behaviors in a standardized setting that does not interfere with patient care.…”

“…SBME is a useful method to study and teach provider communication behaviors because it allows researchers to replicate particular clinical scenarios in ways not possible in real patient encounters. Several studies investigated the language used in discussions with patients, as well as how treatment options were framed 40–42…”

Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Analysis of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale for Use with Spanish Nurses

“…Training in these competencies may improve nursing professionals’ attitudes toward end-of-life care [4], their levels of anxiety [5], and even the decision-making skills of patients and their families [6].…”