1956
DOI: 10.2307/2844050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kinship System of the Tallensi: A Revaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1967
1967
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their concerns were systems and structures, integration and stability, and groups and the relationships between groups, conceptualized in terms of paradigms of descent and alliance. Beginning in the 1950s, kinship theory began to be subjected to a series of critiques (Bloch 1973;Goody 1973;Kuper 1982;Leach 1961Leach , 1968Lewis 1965;Needham 1971;Worsley 1956), of which the most devastating and most productive for future research were published by Schneider (1965Schneider ( , 1972Schneider ( , 1980Schneider ( , 1984.…”
Section: Introduction: Theoretical Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their concerns were systems and structures, integration and stability, and groups and the relationships between groups, conceptualized in terms of paradigms of descent and alliance. Beginning in the 1950s, kinship theory began to be subjected to a series of critiques (Bloch 1973;Goody 1973;Kuper 1982;Leach 1961Leach , 1968Lewis 1965;Needham 1971;Worsley 1956), of which the most devastating and most productive for future research were published by Schneider (1965Schneider ( , 1972Schneider ( , 1980Schneider ( , 1984.…”
Section: Introduction: Theoretical Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…term Big Man is given in the ethnographic 2 Fallers 1956: 197 distinguishes between tradi-literature is commonly to be found in acephelous tional and civil-service chiefs. The Teso chiefly societies and peasant societies which are not feudal, entrepreneurs of this essay resemble his 'client-See Worsley 1956;Barnes 1962;Strathern 1966. A chiefs'. developmental relationship exists between the Big 3 See, for example, Arrighi and Saul 1973; Men of acephelous societies and the patrons and Balandier 1951; Biebuyck and Douglas 1961; political brokers of the contemporary local scene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy (1979) has postulated that unilineal descent in Lowland South America functions as a rule of exclusion, limiting the numbers of potential claimants to resources exploited by a group. Vol.47, No.4,1982 For the Tallensi, Worsley (1956) correlates degree of corporateness of kin groups with increased pressure on agricultural land; Meggitt (1965) notes increased emphasis on the agnatic principle among the Mae Enga in areas of land scarcity. It follows that bilaterality-a rule that maximizes recruitment options-can be suggested as a response to conditions in which labor rather than land constitutes a limiting factor in the productivity and security of a local population (cf.…”
Section: Domestic and Political Economymentioning
confidence: 99%