1984
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/17/25/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The k.p interaction in InP and GaAs from the band-gap dependence of the effective mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we neglect to first order the pressure variation of 8, which has been justified in GaAs based on the balance between d-electron and lattice compression effects [6]. The pressure variation of Eg is found from experiment: E:(P)/Eg(P = 0) = 1 + 6.87 xlOP3P -1.03 x 10-5P2 ( P in kbar) Ill].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we neglect to first order the pressure variation of 8, which has been justified in GaAs based on the balance between d-electron and lattice compression effects [6]. The pressure variation of Eg is found from experiment: E:(P)/Eg(P = 0) = 1 + 6.87 xlOP3P -1.03 x 10-5P2 ( P in kbar) Ill].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this difference is a divergence on the interpretation of the influence of the remote bands on the experimental measurements of the electron spin resonance as pointed out by Shantharama et al. 98,99 In their article they compare, e.g., Chadi et al 95 value for GaAs of E P = 29 eV with their estimation based on an analysis of a 14×14 k·p Hamiltonian of E P = 25.0(5) eV. The reason for the divergence is atributed to an overestimation of the influence of the remote bands.…”
Section: E K·p Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the relation E P ϰ 1 / a 2 between 0 and 300 K E P should change about −0.4% or less. 11,12 However, this procedure only considers the static change of 1 / a 2 . With a phenomenological approach of a temperature dependency of E P the experimental data can only be correctly described by an about 14 times larger, i.e., −5.4% decrease in E P from 2.6 K to room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%