2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2021.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The isotope record (δ13C, δ18O) of vertical mobility in incremental tissues (tooth enamel, hair) of modern livestock: A reference set from the Mongolian Altai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more detailed study would be required to determine the reason with higher certainty. As for the 1‰ difference in δ 13 C between horse/pony and cattle, similar lower δ 13 C values in horses in comparison to cattle and sheep/goats were found in other studies and interpreted as related to differences in pasturing strategies between species or as potentially caused by metabolic processes [94][95][96]. This difference may contribute to the higher δ 13 C values observed among domestic fauna in the 11-13 th centuries, as the proportion of fauna represented by cattle is the biggest for this period (n = 18 compared to 8 in 13-16 th centuries and 2 in the 16-18 th centuries), while both horse and cattle samples are rather evenly distributed among sites.…”
Section: Diet In Belarus Between the 11 Th And 18 Th Centuries Adsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, more detailed study would be required to determine the reason with higher certainty. As for the 1‰ difference in δ 13 C between horse/pony and cattle, similar lower δ 13 C values in horses in comparison to cattle and sheep/goats were found in other studies and interpreted as related to differences in pasturing strategies between species or as potentially caused by metabolic processes [94][95][96]. This difference may contribute to the higher δ 13 C values observed among domestic fauna in the 11-13 th centuries, as the proportion of fauna represented by cattle is the biggest for this period (n = 18 compared to 8 in 13-16 th centuries and 2 in the 16-18 th centuries), while both horse and cattle samples are rather evenly distributed among sites.…”
Section: Diet In Belarus Between the 11 Th And 18 Th Centuries Adsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some data have appeared in multiple studies or review papers since they were first published, in which case we traced them back to the original publication. Only studies that reported (1996), , , Harris and Cerling (2002), Cerling et al (2003), Cerling et al (2004), Boisserie et al (2005), Hoppe et al (2006), Feranec (2007), Cerling et al (2008), Fenner (2008), Copeland et al (2008), Levin et al (2008), Wang et al (2008), Copeland et al (2009), Cerling et al (2011), Kingston (2011), Nelson (2013), van der Merwe (2013), Cerling et al (2015), Martin et al (2015), Luyt and Sealy (2018), Rivera-Araya and Birch (2018), Lazzerini et al (2021), and this study.…”
Section: Published δ 13 C E Datasupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In most instances, we considered only samples from wild animals. Two exceptions are studies of free-range livestock (Wang et al, 2008;Lazzerini et al, 2021), included to increase the sample size from Asia. Along with published δ 13 C E data, we collected the following information from the literature whenever available: taxonomic identification, sample identification number (field number or museum catalog number), provenance (locality name, geographic coordinates, elevation), year of collection from the field, sampled element (tooth position), method of sampling (serial or bulk), and whether or not samples were pretreated before analysis.…”
Section: Published δ 13 C E Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed Hermes et al (2019) to fit a cosine function to the δ 18 O apa series from each analyzed tooth in order to visualize the isotopic data and estimate birth seasonality, which is an implementation of the method by Balasse et al (2012) in Microsoft Excel that is used widely (Lazzerini et al, 2020, 2021; Tornero et al, 2015; Ventresca‐Miller et al, 2020). In contrast, our method was written as fully reproducible scripts using the R programming language, v. 4.1.0 (R Core Team, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%