Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard term (12 months) or long term (>12 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus short term (<6 months) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources Relevant studies published between June 1983 and April 2018 from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister.eu. Review methods Randomised controlled trials comparing two of the three durations of DAPT (short term, standard term, and long term) after PCI with DES were included. The primary study outcomes were cardiac or non-cardiac death, all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding events. Results 17 studies (n=46 864) were included. Compared with short term DAPT, network meta-analysis showed that long term DAPT resulted in higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.49) and non-cardiac death (1.63, 1.03 to 2.59); standard term DAPT was associated with higher rates of any bleeding (1.39, 1.01 to 1.92). No noticeable difference was observed in other primary endpoints. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the risks of non-cardiac death and bleeding were further increased for ≥18 months of DAPT compared with short term or standard term DAPT. In the subgroup analysis, long term DAPT led to higher all cause mortality than short term DAPT in patients implanted with newer-generation DES (1.99, 1.04 to 3.81); short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety to standard term DAPT with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation and newer-generation DES placement. The heterogeneity of pooled trials was low, providing more confidence in the interpretation of results. Conclusions In patients with all clinical presentations, compared with short term DAPT (clopidogrel), long term DAPT led to higher rates of major bleeding and non-cardiac death, and standard term DAPT was associated with an increased risk of any bleeding. For patients with ACS, short term DAPT presented similar efficacy and safety with standard term DAPT. For patients implanted with newer-generation DES, long term DAPT resulted in more all cause mortality than short term DAPT. Although the optimal duration of DAPT should take personal ischaemic and bleeding risks into account, this study suggested short term DAPT could be considered for most patients after PCI with DES, combining evidence from both direct and indirect comparisons. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018099519.

Objective: To investigate whether endometrial thickness (EMT) influences the incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic tertiary-care medical center.

Electrochromic (EC) windows with controllable transmittances according to ambient temperature and solar irradiation strength are highly desired for energy‐efficient buildings. However, traditional EC windows operate via consuming electrical energy to trigger the chromogenic reactions, with negligible energy storage ability. Herein, a facile battery‐type Prussian blue (PB, Fe4III[FeII(CN)6]3)/Zn EC window with excellent EC properties (transmittance modulation = 84.9% at 633 nm), remarkable energy storage ability (average output voltage = 1.24 V and areal capacity = 78.9 mAh m−2), fast switching time (tbleaching = 4.1 s and tcoloring = 4.6 s), as well as an ultralong cycling lifetime (7000 cycles with 60.7% capacity retention and 92.7% transmittance modulation retention) is reported, thanks to the rational electrode and electrolyte design. As an EC window, this device can effectively promote energy efficiency and occupational comfort of buildings by regulating visible light transmittance. As a battery, this device can work as backup power or a component of smart grids, making the buildings more sustainable and functional. The design concept of this bifunctional device is helpful to further the development of next‐generation EC windows.

STUDY QUESTION To evaluate the impact of storage time after vitrification on embryo viability, pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes. SUMMARY ANSWER The prolonged storage time of vitrified embryos negatively affected pregnancy outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate; but did not influence neonatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Although vitrification has been the fundamental tool of ART treatments in recent years, few studies have explored the influence of storage period after vitrification on embryonic and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective study was performed among 24 698 patients with the first vitrified embryo transfer following a freeze-all strategy during the period from January 2011 to December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING, METHODS A total of 24 698 patients met the inclusion criteria and were grouped according to the storage time (11 330 patients in Group 1 with storage time &lt;3 months, 9614 patients in Group 2 with storage time between 3 and 6 months, 3188 patients in Group 3 with storage time between 6 and 12 months and 566 in Group 4 with storage time between 12 and 24 months). The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes were compared between different storage time groups. Multivariate logistic regression and linear regression were performed to evaluate the independent effect of storage time on clinical outcomes, adjusting for important confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the chance of biochemical pregnancy (Group 1 as reference; Group 2: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.97; Group 3: aOR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90; Group 4: aOR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.56–0.81), clinical pregnancy (Group 2: aOR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.96; Group 3: aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.87; Group 4: aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.54–0.79) and live birth (Group 2: aOR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.85–0.95; Group 3: aOR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91; Group 4: aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.72) significantly decreased with the increasing storage time, whereas the relationship between miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and storage time did not reach statistical significance. In addition, there was no evidence of differences in adverse neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, low birthweight, high birthweight, macrosomia or birth defects) between groups. LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our study was limited by the retrospective design from a single center, the conclusion from our study needs to be verified in further studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study provides new findings about the relationship between prolonged storage time of vitrified embryos and clinical outcomes and offers evidence for the safety of using long-stored embryos after vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81903324, 81771533, 81571397, 81701523), National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. SQ2018YFC100163). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

STUDY QUESTION Does the endometrial preparation protocol for frozen embryo transfer (FET) have an impact on perinatal outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER Singleton newborns from conceptions after an artificial FET cycle had a higher risk of being large for gestational age (LGA). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Most previous studies have concentrated on the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates of different endometrial preparation protocols for FET. However, the impacts of these cycle regimens on perinatal outcomes including birthweight, gestational age (GA) and related outcomes require more investigation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We retrospectively analysed all singletons conceived by women who underwent non-donor FET cycles between July 2014 and July 2017. The propensity score matching (PSM) method using nearest neighbour matching at a proportion of 1:1 was established to adjust for factors that influence the probability of receiving different FET cycle regimens. The main outcomes of the study included birthweight and its related outcomes, Z-score, low birthweight (LBW, &lt;2500 g), small for gestational age (SGA, ≤10th percentile of referential birthweight), LGA (≥90th percentile of referential birthweight) and macrosomia (birthweight &gt;4000 g). The study outcomes also included GA at birth, preterm delivery (&lt;37 weeks), very preterm delivery (&lt;32 weeks), very low birthweight (VLBW, &lt;1500 g), term LBW (at 37 weeks of gestation or greater) and preterm LBW (at &lt;37 weeks of gestation). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 9267 cycles with live-born singletons were included in the analysis in our centre between July 2014 and July 2017. Of these, 2224, 4299 and 2744 live-born singletons were conceived by natural cycle FET, stimulated cycle FET and artificial cycle FET, respectively. After PSM, 1947 cycles of natural cycle FET versus stimulated cycle FET, 1682 cycles of stimulated cycle FET versus artificial cycle FET and 2333 cycles of natural cycle FET versus artificial cycle FET were included in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A higher mean birthweight and Z-score were observed in the artificial cycle FET group than in the stimulated cycle FET group (P = 0.005; P = 0.004, respectively). Singleton newborns conceived after artificial cycle FET were more likely to be LGA than those born after natural cycle FET or stimulated cycle FET (19.92% versus 16.94% and 19.29% versus 16.12%, respectively). The adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 1.25 (1.05, 1.49) for artificial cycle FET compared with natural cycle FET (P = 0.014) and 1.26 (1.08, 1.46) for artificial cycle FET compared with stimulated cycle FET (P = 0.003). Newborns conceived after stimulated cycle FET had a lower mean GA at birth and a lower mean birthweight than those born after natural cycle FET or artificial cycle FET. The stimulated cycle FET group had lower adjusted odds of being macrosomia than the natural cycle FET group. No significant differences between natural cycle FET and stimulated cycle FET were found for any of the other outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study had the disadvantage of being retrospective, and some cases were excluded due to missing data. The original allocation process was not randomized, which may have introduced bias. We have chosen not to account for multiple comparisons in our statistical analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS LGA can have long-term consequences in terms of risk for disease, which means that the influences of artificial cycle FET are of clinical significance and deserve more attention. Furthermore, these findings are critical for clinicians to be able to make an informed decision when choosing an endometrial preparation method. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31770989 to Y.W.) and the Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Foundation of China (JYLJ030 to Y.W.). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

STUDY QUESTION Does the quality of a single transferred blastocyst affect singleton birthweight in frozen-embryo transfer (FET) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER The transfer of a poor-quality blastocyst was associated with lower mean birthweight and gestation-adjusted birthweight (Z-scores) when compared with the transfer of an excellent-quality blastocyst during FET cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Embryo quality is a strong predictor of IVF success rates. However, very few studies have examined the effect of embryo quality on singleton birthweight. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective study involved singleton live births born to women undergoing frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers during the period from January 2010 to December 2017 at a tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 1207 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included and were grouped into four groups depending on the blastocyst quality: excellent, good, average and poor. The primary outcome measure was singleton birthweight. The Z-score was employed to calculate the birthweight adjusted for gestational age and newborn gender. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between embryo quality and neonatal birthweight after adjustment for some potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the primary multivariable model, singletons from the poor-quality blastocyst group weighed 183.5 g less than those from the excellent-quality blastocyst group (95% CI: −295.1 to −71.9 g, P = 0.001) in terms of mean birthweight after accounting for patient characteristics, IVF treatment parameters, the year of treatment and newborn gender. Likewise, poor-quality blastocyst transfer was associated with lower gestation-adjusted Z-scores than the transfer of excellent-quality blastocysts (β = −0.35, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.12, P = 0.003). LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION The current study was limited by its retrospective design and the fact that our analysis was restricted to women with singleton births from single blastocyst transfers. Future prospective studies are required to confirm our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our findings provide new insight into the relationship between embryo quality and neonatal outcomes by showing that poor-quality blastocyst transfer was associated with a decrease in singleton birthweight. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2018YFC1003000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81771533, 81571397 and 31770989), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2018M630456). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.

No abstract

The single-embryo transfer (SET) is the recommended approach to improve the live birth rate and reduce the complications related with multiple pregnancies. However, the physicians generally chose to transfer two embryos when the embryo quality decreased. The effect on the in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes following the transfer of a poor-quality embryo (PQE) along with a good-quality embryo (GQE) has been explored. However, previous studies were limited by the fresh embryo transfer cycles or the small sample size. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed among 26,676 women (the mean age was 31.72 years) undergoing first frozen embryo transfer (FET) from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients were grouped into five subgroups, including SET with one GQE (SET-GQE, 2235 patients for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 756 patients for blastocyst transfer), SET with one PQE (SET-PQE, 148 patients for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 362 patients for blastocyst transfer), double-embryo transfer with two GQE (DET-2GQE, 20,461 patients for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 519 patients for blastocyst transfer), double-embryo transfer (DET) with one GQE plus one PQE (DET-GQE+PQE, 1541 patients for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 266 patients for blastocyst transfer), and DET with two PQE (DET-2PQE, 228 patients for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 160 patients for blastocyst transfer). Multivariable logistic regression models were performed after controlling for other potential confounders to estimate the effect of number and quality of transferred embryos on pregnancy outcomes. Result: Although the live birth rate was significantly higher after DET-GQE+PQE compared with SET-GQE for cleavage-stage embryo transfer [574 of 1541 (37.25%) vs. 571 of 2235 (25.55%)], no significant difference was found between DET-GQE+PQE and SET-GQE for blastocyst transfer [143 of 266 (53.76%) vs. 325 of 756 (42.99%)]. However, DET-GQE+PQE also had the highest multiple live births in both cleavage-stage embryo transfer [134 of 1541 (8.70%)] and blastocyst transfer [46 of 266 (17.29%)].