2010
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The iPad and medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this manner, tablet PCs have been shown to have a significant role in education. Moreover, the iPad has been used and will be used for various purposes by healthcare professionals (Fromme, Kenworthy-Heinige, & Hribar, 2010;Richter et al, 2008;Robertson, Miles, & Bloor, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this manner, tablet PCs have been shown to have a significant role in education. Moreover, the iPad has been used and will be used for various purposes by healthcare professionals (Fromme, Kenworthy-Heinige, & Hribar, 2010;Richter et al, 2008;Robertson, Miles, & Bloor, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] One device demonstrating promise in the medical setting is the Apple iPad tablet, the industry leader in terms of available applications (apps). 5 Since its unveiling in early 2010, the iPad has been adopted by the medical community for education, 6-8 surgical assistance, 9 and provider-patient communication assistance. 10 For both physicians and patients, the adoption of new HIT such as the iPad, is determined by a combination of environmental (e.g., integration across organizational boundaries, interface with multiple electronic health record (EHR) systems, legal concerns regarding patient privacy) and individual factors (e.g., daily work flow issues, concerns about control, autonomy, authority and trust regarding the use of individual information, and motivation to change to another device).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Given the 9-year interval between the publication of these two studies, it is likely that the difference in physiotherapists' online resource use between these two settings was influenced by the significant technological developments during this period, including advances in information technology used in the health care industry. [10][11][12][13] The difference may also be related to the Australian study's focus on clinicians' use of the statewide health department online resource portal, 2 whereas the 2013 United Kingdom study examined the use of online resources in general. 9 For these reasons, it is not clear whether trends in resource use reported in the 2004 study 2 would still be accurate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%