2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The IOM’s Missing Migrants Project: The Global Authority on Border Deaths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data collection and profiling of migrants respond to different needs of the EU and IOM: making transit movements ‘knowable’ and therefore ‘governable’ (Vaughan-Williams 2015: 2) through targeted intervention; identifying countries to which migrants can be returned; reproducing the transit state label that justifies the existence of the IOM and creates the need for its humanitarian interventions (Ashutosh & Mountz 2011; Dini 2018; Fine 2018; Al Tamimi et al 2020); and promoting a ‘border spectacle’ (De Genova 2013) and a ‘culture of immobility’ (Pécoud 2010) through awareness-raising and information campaigns in which the risks of migration are mainly used as arguments to discourage migrants from attempting to enter the EU irregularly (Heller 2014; Bartels 2017; Kluczewska 2020). In this regard, IOM Niger conducts ‘regular outreach activities’ in Agadez, Arlit, Dirkou and Niamey, with ‘over 50 community mobilisers’ that ‘sensitise migrants and local communities about irregular migration and its alternatives [voluntary repatriation]’ (IOM Official 2020 Int.).…”
Section: The Iom and Humanitarian Borderwork In Nigermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collection and profiling of migrants respond to different needs of the EU and IOM: making transit movements ‘knowable’ and therefore ‘governable’ (Vaughan-Williams 2015: 2) through targeted intervention; identifying countries to which migrants can be returned; reproducing the transit state label that justifies the existence of the IOM and creates the need for its humanitarian interventions (Ashutosh & Mountz 2011; Dini 2018; Fine 2018; Al Tamimi et al 2020); and promoting a ‘border spectacle’ (De Genova 2013) and a ‘culture of immobility’ (Pécoud 2010) through awareness-raising and information campaigns in which the risks of migration are mainly used as arguments to discourage migrants from attempting to enter the EU irregularly (Heller 2014; Bartels 2017; Kluczewska 2020). In this regard, IOM Niger conducts ‘regular outreach activities’ in Agadez, Arlit, Dirkou and Niamey, with ‘over 50 community mobilisers’ that ‘sensitise migrants and local communities about irregular migration and its alternatives [voluntary repatriation]’ (IOM Official 2020 Int.).…”
Section: The Iom and Humanitarian Borderwork In Nigermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOM’s Missing Migrants project fits into this context. Al Tamimi, Cuttitta, and Last (in press) indicate that the practice of counting deaths by IOM staff had begun incrementally: it is only in response to the 2013 shipwrecks that IOM as an institution formalized this project. 17 Media and political attention was at their height and IOM decided to position itself on this issue by constituting its own list of deaths.…”
Section: The Humanitarianization Of Borders and The (Inter)governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOM’s influence and resources, coupled with its claim to constitute the “only existing global database on migrant deaths,” 25 directly threatens NGOs’ capacity to maintain this activity. As Al Tamimi et al (in press) write,in 2015, UNITED suffered a significant reduction in its core funding which supported the employees working on the List of Deaths. Since 2016, two other news-sourced databases that pre-dated MMP (the Migrants Files and the Fortress Europe blog) have stopped being updated.…”
Section: The Humanitarianization Of Borders and The (Inter)governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation