The Investigation of Predictors of Cyberbullyingand Cyber Victimization in Adolescents

Ateş, Bünyamin; Kaya, Alican; Tunç, Erhan

doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.157.9

Cited by 15 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The works studied analyzing family cohesion, support, care, attachment, and closeness (Ates et al 2018;Doty et al 2017;Lee and Shin 2017;Vazsonyi et al 2017) agree that these are important variables to prevent cyberbullying, both in terms of victimization and perpetration. Family cohesion had also previously been pointed out as a protective factor of social adjustment during adolescence, which reduced the odds of experiencing cyberbullying perpetration (Navarro et al 2013).…”

Section: Parental Cohesionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research on parental support, warmth, cohesion, closeness, care, and attachment supports the importance of establishing a good relationship between parents and their children in order to prevent this phenomenon. According to Ates et al (2018), family support was negatively associated with cybervictimization and cyberbullying perpetration. Vazsonyi et al (2017) noted that higher levels of paternal and maternal closeness were significantly correlated with lower levels of cyberbullying perpetration.…”

Section: Parental Support Warmth Cohesion Closeness Care and Attmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Castro

Priegue

2019

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the number of studies conducted on the influence of family variables oncyberbullying perpetration and victimization has increased, especially in terms of relational familyprocesses. The present review investigates the role played by family variables on cyberbullyingperpetration and victimization. A systematic literature review was conducted in five databases(ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science) from October 2016 to October 2018.During this brief period of time, the number of publications on family variables and cyberbullying,both perpetration and victimization, has significantly increased. We eventually reviewed 34 studieswhich rigorously met the selection criteria of our research. For the analysis of the results, wedistinguish between two types of variables according to the following possibilities of pedagogicalintervention: Structural (contextual family variables and individual parental processes), anddynamic (relational family processes). Our review found evidence that there is more controversyaround structural variables than around dynamic variables. The most consistent variables are familycommunication and the quality of the family relationship. However, there is a perceived need forclarifying the influence that different structural variables, parental educational styles, and parentalmediation exert on the prevention and consolidation of cyberbullying perpetration andcybervictimization.

show abstract

Section: Parental Cohesionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Parental Support Warmth Cohesion Closeness Care and Attmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Castro

Priegue

2019

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This scale includes eight items, which are rated on a five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very well). The item scores were summed with a score from 0 to 32 and categorized according to three levels: low (0-16), average (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and high (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). The internal consistency of the scale was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.842).…”

Section: Individual Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The social microsystem includes social support, such as relationships with family and peers, school social climate and community social capital. The social support from family and friends offers the strongest protection against cyberbullying [30][31][32]. The review study of López-Castro and Priege [33] found evidence that the most consistent family variables influencing cyberbullying are family communication and the quality of the family relationships.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial Determinants of Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Involvement—The Role of Body Satisfaction

Malinowska-Cieślik

Dzielska²,

Oblacińska³

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Although the relationship between adolescents’ body image and cyberviolence has been proved, little is known about the place of body image among other psychosocial determinants. The study aimed to assess the relationship between body satisfaction and cyberbullying in the context of other psychosocial factors. Methods: We used data of 5817 adolescents (47.6% boys, mean age = 15.43) from the survey conducted in 2018 in Poland as a part of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children. Four groups of cyberbullying involvement were defined: only bullies, only victims, both bullies and victims, and not involved. Body satisfaction and ten other independent variables were classified as sociodemographic, socioeconomic, individual and social factors. A series of multinomial logistic regression models were estimated and compared using the pseudo R-sq Nagelkerke coefficient. Results: Although family support seemed to be the most protective, the findings have proved that body satisfaction reduces significantly the risk of cyberbullying. The relationship was more pronounced in victims and bully-victims. A slightly stronger protective effect of body satisfaction has been observed in boys. Conclusions: The strengthening of body image may be an effective measure to prevent adolescents’ cyberbullying, as well as to bring about improvements in social support, connections to others, and school performance.

show abstract

“…En esta misma línea, Boniel-Nissim y Sasson (2018) encontraron que la escasa comunicación entre progenitores y descendentes estaba asociada con la cibervictimización, mientras que la comunicación positiva, tanto materna como paterna, se asoció con un menor nivel de riesgo. En cuanto al apoyo, nuestros resultados son similares a los obtenidos por Ates et al (2018), dado que el apoyo a la familia fue asociado negativamente a ser víctima de ciberacoso.…”

Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified

Tipos de mediación parental del uso de las TIC y su relación con la cibervictimización del alumnado de educación primaria

Castro

López-Ratón

Caamaño

2021

Bordón

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCCIÓN. Las familias asumen, constantemente, nuevos desafíos educativos derivados de la necesidad de educar a los menores en el uso, cada vez más generalizado, de las tecnologías. Las estrategias educativas familiares que lo regulan se conocen como mediación parental. Existen cuatro tipos de mediación parental en función del uso de estrategias de regulación-control y de comunicaciónapoyo: a) mediación parental negligente (bajo grado de regulación-control y de comunicación-apoyo); b) mediación parental permisiva-indulgente (bajo grado de regulación-control, pero alto de comunicación- apoyo); c) mediación parental restrictiva-autoritaria (elevado grado de regulación-control, pero bajo de comunicación-apoyo); y d) mediación parental democrática (elevado grado de regulacióncontrol y de comunicación-apoyo). El objetivo principal del estudio es conocer si existe algún tipo de relación estadísticamente significativa entre estos tipos de mediación parental basados en el uso de estrategias de regulación-control y comunicación-apoyo y la cibervictimización del alumnado que cursa 5.º o 6.º de educación primaria. MÉTODO. Una muestra de 1.169 familias de 26 centros educativos de Galicia (España) fue encuestada a través de un cuestionario autoadministrado que mide tanto la mediación parental en función del uso de estrategias de regulación-control y de comunicación-apoyo en ocho situaciones habituales de uso de las tecnologías por los menores, así como la cibervictimización del alumnado. Los análisis llevados a cabo con el programa estadístico SPSS Statistics se basaron en la prueba de asociación no paramétrica chi-cuadrado (χ²) y el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman para conocer tanto la dirección como el grado de las asociaciones. RESULTADOS. Los resultados obtenidos nos permitieron identificar una relación estadísticamente significativa entre el tipo de mediación parental y la cibervictimización, obteniendo frecuencias de cibervictimización inferiores cuando nos referimos al tipo de mediación parental democrática, pero superiores para la mediación negligente, permisiva-indulgente y restrictiva-autoritaria. DISCUSIÓN. Se discuten las implicaciones para la intervención educativa, concluyendo que los programas de prevención del ciberacoso deben incluir estrategias de mediación parental que potencien la comunicación y el apoyo intrafamiliar.

show abstract

The Investigation of Predictors of Cyberbullyingand Cyber Victimization in Adolescents

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review

Psychosocial Determinants of Adolescents’ Cyberbullying Involvement—The Role of Body Satisfaction

Tipos de mediación parental del uso de las TIC y su relación con la cibervictimización del alumnado de educación primaria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About