2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inverted-L ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy in maxillomandibular advancement for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea patients: A retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 28 patients were split into two separate groups, nine receiving an ILO and 19 receiving the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Both groups saw significant apnea hypopnea index decreases, with a 90.2% decrease in the ILO group and an 85.6% decrease in the SSRO group (24). Differences came between groups in physical airway changes.…”
Section: Inverted L Osteotomy (Ilo)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A total of 28 patients were split into two separate groups, nine receiving an ILO and 19 receiving the sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Both groups saw significant apnea hypopnea index decreases, with a 90.2% decrease in the ILO group and an 85.6% decrease in the SSRO group (24). Differences came between groups in physical airway changes.…”
Section: Inverted L Osteotomy (Ilo)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The inverted-L ramus osteotomy was compared with SSO for MMA and was found to be both effective (41). The cohort of Riley and Powell published in 1993 on 306 consecutively treated surgical patients who underwent 2 phases of surgeries, the RDI dropped from 55.8 to 9.2.…”
Section: Mmamentioning
confidence: 99%