2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The intertextuality of children's explanations in a technology-enriched early years science classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instructors can watch the targeted experiment on a video before class and then revise the presentation to meet the needs of the particular group of students, making it more functional in a new form. The results of studies that have focused on the use of inquiry-based teaching materials and how they can be useful to students in terms of providing easy comprehension and to teachers as a guideline for teaching, are consistent with the outcome of the present study (e.g., Edelson, Gordin, & Pea, 1999;Kumpulainen, Vasama, & Kangassalo, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Instructors can watch the targeted experiment on a video before class and then revise the presentation to meet the needs of the particular group of students, making it more functional in a new form. The results of studies that have focused on the use of inquiry-based teaching materials and how they can be useful to students in terms of providing easy comprehension and to teachers as a guideline for teaching, are consistent with the outcome of the present study (e.g., Edelson, Gordin, & Pea, 1999;Kumpulainen, Vasama, & Kangassalo, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It also contributes to research on science learning more generally (e.g., Varelas & Pappas, 2006;Kumpulainen et al, 2003), by showing how students -through imagination -can create and evaluate contrasting explanations, even seemingly implausible ones. More specifically, our conceptual framework illuminated what triggered the loops of imagination and the different forms these loops took Furthermore, our conceptual framework helped to unpack the social work needed for imagination to take place in classroom interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The students are also asked to explore different explanations to phenomena in the natural world and judge their plausibility (Varelas & Pappas, 2006;Kumpulainen et al, 2003), all of which require imagination. In other words, when learning about particular phenomena, students (like scientist) revisit and revise how they imagine these phenomena.…”
Section: …And Their Dynamics In Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertextuality has also been used to analyze the social construction of disciplinary learning. A study by Kumpulainen, Vasama, and Kangassalo (2003) illuminated how students make sense of science in inquiry classrooms by examining learners' construction of science-related explanations and their intertextual connections. This study illuminated how intertextual links functioned as tools for the students (a) to share and validate previous experiences as sources of knowledge, (b) to establish reciprocity with one another in meaning-making, (c) to define themselves as learners of science and as individuals with specific experiences and backgrounds, and (d) to construct, maintain, and contest the cultural practices of what it means to do and learn science in the classroom.…”
Section: Intertextualitymentioning
confidence: 99%