The Interplay of Low Identification, Psychological Detachment, and Cynicism for Predicting Counterproductive Work Behaviour

Abstract

Prior research suggests that psychological detachment buffers the detrimental effects of negative work events and stressors on employees’ subsequent performance and well‐being. This, however, assumes that employees are motivated to reengage in their work following detachment, which may not always be true. Our paper examines the potential dark side of psychological detachment by exploring its moderating effects on the relationship of low organisational identification with counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) via cynicism toward work. Based on self‐discrepancy theory, we argue that detachment strengthens the link from low identification to cynicism because it reinforces the psychological distance of lowly identified employees with the organisation and provides them with additional resources to more deeply reflect on their mismatch with their organisation, thus generating stronger feelings of doubt and distrust that characterise cynicism. We also hypothesise that detachment strengthens the relation from cynicism to CWB, because detachment reinforces personal separation from work in cynical employees and because cynical employees may leverage their replenished resources to fuel deviant acts. Multi‐wave data collected from two field samples support our hypotheses. We discuss the implications of our study and propose future research directions.

Challenging the Universality of Job Resources: Why, When, and For Whom Are They Beneficial?

“…Job resources may in fact exacerbate some of those personal characteristics likely to impair people’s well‐being. For example, Tong et al () show that employees are more likely to show cynicism and counterproductive behaviors when they do not identify strongly with their job. Thus, in certain circumstances, workers may not necessarily benefit from job resources.…”

“…Focusing on the individual (micro) level in which job resources may exert their effects, Tong, Chong, Chen, Johnson, and Ren () noted that for some employees the effects of job resources, such as low organizational identification, may be negative. Using a sample of Chinese workers, the authors showed that employees who do not identify adequately with work may not necessarily benefit from detaching from it in the evening hours.…”

How Does Sexual Harassment Influence the Female Employee’s Negative Response in a Deluxe Hotel?

“…Chen et al [ 55 ] cited psychological detachment as a negative influence on counterproductive behavior and mediates the influence of work demand on counterproductive behavior. Tong et al [ 56 ] demonstrated that psychological detachment experienced inside an organization becomes one of the stress factors that negatively influences employees’ counterproductive behavior and reduces the harmful effect of psychological stress factors on employees’ performance and well-being. Empirical evidence proves that increased experience of psychological detachment diminishes stress response, such as job burnout [ 57 ].…”

The dual threat of COVID-19 to health and job security – Exploring the role of mindfulness in sustaining frontline employee-related outcomes

“…Second, recent research suggests that the effect of resources on outcomes is not as straightforward as often suggested. While the traditional expectation is that resources diminish job demands, some resources may increase job demands in certain situations ( Tong et al, 2020 , Wang et al, 2020 , Wang et al, 2020 ). Indeed, scholars have suggested that OM might have potentially opposing effects linking it to employee outcomes ( Sutcliffe et al, 2016 ).…”