2008
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0b013e3282f55559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Internet, HIV serosorting and transmission risk among men who have sex with men, San Francisco

Abstract: In a community-based, time-location sampling survey in San Francisco, Internet-met partners were not more likely to be HIV seroconcordant among HIV-negative and HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) compared with partners met at bars and dance clubs. In addition, HIV-negative MSM were more likely to have unprotected anal intercourse with potentially serodiscordant partners met on the Internet compared with those met at bars and dance clubs (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0, P = 0.01).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
32
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among HIV-negative men, we found that Internet anal sex partnerships were less likely to involve non-concordant UAI than partnerships formed in some other settings, a difference that was significant when comparing Internet partnerships to those initiated in bars or dance clubs. These findings are consistent with some reports [36][37][38], but not others [39]. In general, studies that have examined both the individual-level and partnershiplevel impact of Internet sex-seeking find that while MSM who use the Internet to find sex partners are more likely to engage in sexual risk behavior, Internet partnerships are not more likely to include non-concordant UAI than partnerships formed through other means [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Among HIV-negative men, we found that Internet anal sex partnerships were less likely to involve non-concordant UAI than partnerships formed in some other settings, a difference that was significant when comparing Internet partnerships to those initiated in bars or dance clubs. These findings are consistent with some reports [36][37][38], but not others [39]. In general, studies that have examined both the individual-level and partnershiplevel impact of Internet sex-seeking find that while MSM who use the Internet to find sex partners are more likely to engage in sexual risk behavior, Internet partnerships are not more likely to include non-concordant UAI than partnerships formed through other means [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings are similar to those found in other studies carried out in industrialised countries, where HIV-seropositive MSM who serosort are more likely to look for sexual partners on websites [14,16,18]. However, our study did not find that HIV-seropositive MSM were more likely than HIV-seronegative MSM to serosort [10,13,16].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 34%
“…Indeed, it may be easier to disclose one's HIV seropositivity to potential sexual partners during online encounters, especially on "positive-seeking-positive" websites [18]. However, for HIV-seronegative MSM, the HIV-seronegativity of potential sexual partners is as uncertain on the Internet as in other venues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internet and gay Web sites/chat rooms may have facilitated or potentialized certain phenomena related to sexual practices among gay and bisexual men, such as barebacking (the practice of intentional unprotected anal intercourse; Berg, 2008;Dawson, Ross, Henry, & Freeman, 2005;Grov & Parsons, 2006;Grov et al, 2007) and serosorting (the search for sex partners with the same HIV status to have unprotected sex), particularly among HIV-positive men (Berry, Raymond, Kellogg, & McFarland, 2008;Grov et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%