2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40803-020-00141-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Rule of Law and the Idea of Normative Authority

Abstract: Domestic and international jurisprudence exist and develop as two ‘pocket universes’ in a sense that they belong to the same fabric of reality, but at the same time many concepts shift their meaning when moved from one pocket to another. This is of a paramount importance for the idea of the rule of law, which in domestic setting was forged in the flame of civil wars and struggles against the rulers. This history and such struggles are something international law has never known, and thus any direct transplanta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…143 When the post-Cold War Kantian politics overtook the Cold War Hobbesian politics, the inhibition in recognizing the normative potential of IR got diluted. Once this inhibition got diluted, the thinly theorized realm of 'the international' became thickly theorized 144 . Often, this thickly theorized realm was explained in terms of Kuhn's notion of 'paradigm shift': that is, 'why certain theories are legitimised.…”
Section: Global Ir: a Paradigm? No A Research Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…143 When the post-Cold War Kantian politics overtook the Cold War Hobbesian politics, the inhibition in recognizing the normative potential of IR got diluted. Once this inhibition got diluted, the thinly theorized realm of 'the international' became thickly theorized 144 . Often, this thickly theorized realm was explained in terms of Kuhn's notion of 'paradigm shift': that is, 'why certain theories are legitimised.…”
Section: Global Ir: a Paradigm? No A Research Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By virtue of the principle of sovereignty, state law does not need to be expressly authorised by international law, provided it is compatible with it. This means that assessing the international legality of these sanctionsand, therefore, their compatibility with the international rule of lawinevitably requires engagement with substantial aspects, in line with the definition of the international rule of law suggested by Gorobets (2020). Such aspects include the nature of the violation they seek to address and their own compatibility with other principles of international law, including jus cogens norms, fundamental rights, and specific treaty obligations (Barber 2021).…”
Section: International Legality: the Lack Of International Regulation...mentioning
confidence: 99%