Post-Imperial English 1996
DOI: 10.1515/9783110872187.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international role of English: The state of the discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publicly announced reason was to enhance "national solidarity" (Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands, 1926, p. 5). Conrad (1996) cites Gates (1992), who criticizes use of the term "cultural imperialism," "an animal from which linguistic imperialism is perhaps derived" (Conrad,p. 27).…”
Section: The Case For Phillipson's Linguistic Imperialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The publicly announced reason was to enhance "national solidarity" (Annual Report of the Governor General of the Philippine Islands, 1926, p. 5). Conrad (1996) cites Gates (1992), who criticizes use of the term "cultural imperialism," "an animal from which linguistic imperialism is perhaps derived" (Conrad,p. 27).…”
Section: The Case For Phillipson's Linguistic Imperialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 75). Conrad (1996) believes the forces behind language spread need to be analyzed empirically. Rannut (1999) has called for a new paradigm, which includes language "penetrating all domains of society" (p. 100).…”
Section: Search For a Unifying Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the early attempts to account for systematic variation in the way English is used by speakers in different parts of the world is a tripartite distinction between English as a Native Language (ENL), English as a Second Language (ESL), and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) (Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech, & Svartvik, 1985;Conrad, 1996). Based on this classification, Stern (1983), Widdowson (1997Widdowson ( , 2003, McArthur (1998), Nunan and Carter (2001), among many other scholars, have proposed definitions and discussed the importance of these distinctions.…”
Section: Enl/esl/efl Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not so easy, however, to argue for a linguicist conspiracy in which private and state agents of ELT conspire to restrict English -although the signal failure of English programmes in much of the world (Hall, 2000) makes it tempting to do so. Although Conrad (1996) notes how English is still spoken by less than 4% in India, if anything it seems that the forces of neocolonialism try to spread English (Phillipson, 2000), even if they are misguided or relatively unsuccessful in doing so.…”
Section: Language Planning In Former British Colonies 269mentioning
confidence: 99%