2002
DOI: 10.1080/14664200208668041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Language Planning and the British Empire: Comparing Pakistan, Malaysia and Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…English, Malay, Chinese and Tamil. This also served to maintain the social and economic segregation among the ethnic groups by limiting the possibility for social mobility and by providing different forms of education to different ethnic groups (Watson, 1980;Powell 2002). Eventually, the British saw that ethnic tensions were rising and realised that the economic, social and political progress in Malaya could be slowed down if these tensions were not solved (Ozóg, 1993).…”
Section: A Brief History Of the Malaysian Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…English, Malay, Chinese and Tamil. This also served to maintain the social and economic segregation among the ethnic groups by limiting the possibility for social mobility and by providing different forms of education to different ethnic groups (Watson, 1980;Powell 2002). Eventually, the British saw that ethnic tensions were rising and realised that the economic, social and political progress in Malaya could be slowed down if these tensions were not solved (Ozóg, 1993).…”
Section: A Brief History Of the Malaysian Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These schools only provided primary education with English deliberately excluded from the curriculum since the British had no interest in creating opportunities for them to progress beyond their villages besides training them into being better cultivators and good citizens (Ozóg, 1993;Powell, 2002). Meanwhile, the Chinese and Indian communities established and funded their own vernacular schools with curriculums imported from their respective homelands as they were unregulated by the British (Powell, 2002). Malay and Tamil medium schools, which only offered primary education, were mainly found in rural Malaya whereas the Chinese-medium schools that offered up to secondary education were mostly located in urban centres (Watson, 1980).…”
Section: A Brief History Of the Malaysian Education Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Malaysian setting, the number of students less proficient in the English language is becoming more prominent (Powell, 2002). In 2002, the change of paradigm concerning the importance of English for knowledge-based purposes has resulted in a new English language policy with the emergence of the Malaysian University English Test (MUET) for pre-tertiary education students.…”
Section: Efl Reading Within the Malaysian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English education in Malaysia began in the early 19th century (Powell, 2002) during the British colonization and was made a compulsory subject in all primary and secondary schools (Course of Studies Regulation 1956, II). However, during the British colonial era, there was no consistent English language educational policy (Muthusami, 1987) due to the British divide and rule ideology.…”
Section: A Review Of Malaysian Efl Educational Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%