2006
DOI: 10.1177/0363546505280214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form

Abstract: Scores on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form vary by age, gender, and history of knee problems. The normative data collected in this article will allow clinicians to interpret how patients with knee injuries are functioning relative to their age- and gender-matched peers and will enable researchers to determine the clinical outcomes of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
370
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
16
370
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For clinical outcome assessment we used the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC2000) Standard Evaluation Form (demographic, subjective and functional evaluation form)[36-38], the SF36 health survey[39], the Lysholm score[40], the Tegner score[40] and the Knee Society score[41]. The examination included assessment of ACL and PCL laxity with the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric, San Diego, U.S.A.) in 25° flexion with 67N, 89N and 134N and with the Rolimeter (Ormed, Freiburg, Germany) in 25° and 70° flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clinical outcome assessment we used the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC2000) Standard Evaluation Form (demographic, subjective and functional evaluation form)[36-38], the SF36 health survey[39], the Lysholm score[40], the Tegner score[40] and the Knee Society score[41]. The examination included assessment of ACL and PCL laxity with the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric, San Diego, U.S.A.) in 25° flexion with 67N, 89N and 134N and with the Rolimeter (Ormed, Freiburg, Germany) in 25° and 70° flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical and functional follow-up assessment was based on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score [1]. Further clinical evaluation criteria consisted of Tegener and Lysholm score [16,26].…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The 24.14 point improvement in the IKDC is higher than previously reported 6 and 9 month MCIDs for focal articular cartilage repair surgery 15 , indicating that the patient was likely to have perceived themselves as improved. 33 On the basis of the reported MCIDs for each of the KOOS subscales 20 , only the KOOS Sport/Rec subscale showed a clinically important improvement from week 1 to week 8 of the programme (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…33 Normative data for the IKDC has shown a mean score of 87.6 (age 18-50). 1 A change in the IKDC score greater than 20.5 means that the individual is likely to perceive themselves as improved. 33 The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the IKDC after surgery for focal articular cartilage defects was found to be 6.3 at 6 months and 16.7 at 12 months postoperatively.…”
Section: International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Fmentioning
confidence: 99%