1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1061-9518(99)00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The international debate over mandatory auditor rotation: a conceptual research framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue tends to resurface as a major audit failure of a corporation collapses (Catanach & Walker, 1999).…”
Section: Audit Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue tends to resurface as a major audit failure of a corporation collapses (Catanach & Walker, 1999).…”
Section: Audit Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H01: Auditor reputation does not influence auditor rotation. Kefee et al 1994, Ragunathan et al 1994, state that the existence of rotation can decrease audit failure, push client to adopt conservative accounting practice, and produce more complete reporting (OCA 1994in Catanach Jr. et al 1999). …”
Section: Auditor Reputation On Auditor Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, many European countries have adopted mandatory auditor rotation as a solution to independence (Buijink, Maijoor, Meiwissen, and Witteloostuijn 1996). 4 See Catanach and Walker (1999) for a detailed discussion about the world-wide debate of mandatory auditor rotation. Catanach and Walker (1999) also proposes that a complete examination of auditor rotation should consider the interactions among auditor tenure, audit quality (which is further affected by auditor's ability to detect misstatements and fraud and professional ethics in performing audit procedures), the economic incentives of providing auditing services, and audit market structure.…”
Section: Raghunandan 2003)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 See Catanach and Walker (1999) for a detailed discussion about the world-wide debate of mandatory auditor rotation. Catanach and Walker (1999) also proposes that a complete examination of auditor rotation should consider the interactions among auditor tenure, audit quality (which is further affected by auditor's ability to detect misstatements and fraud and professional ethics in performing audit procedures), the economic incentives of providing auditing services, and audit market structure. See Dopuch, King, and Schwartz (2001) for a discussion of the current debate of mandatory rotation and auditor independence in the U.S. 5 Schwartz (1997) emphasizes the determination of damage loss itself and concludes that a damage measure that is independent of the actual investment together with a strict liability regime will motivate the auditors to exert the socially optimal effort level and induce the socially optimal level of investment.…”
Section: Raghunandan 2003)mentioning
confidence: 99%