2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2007.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Internal Consistency and Validity of the Patient Evaluation Measure for Outcomes Assessment in Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract: The internal consistency and validity of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) was investigated in the setting of the distal radius fracture by assessing 200 patients 6 to 42 years after injury using the PEM and DASH questionnaires and objective measures of outcome. The PEM was completed separately for both the injured and uninjured wrist. We found highly significant correlations between the PEM and objective measures and, also, between the PEM and DASH scores. We also calculated a comparative PEM score by subt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DASH and Patient Evaluation Measure were both validated for assessing hand function, unlike the assessments of function used in many previous investigations of the distal radius. [11][12][13] A comparative Patient Evaluation Measure was also calculated by obtaining scores for the uninjured and injured arms separately, and subtracting the uninjured score from that of the injured one. This attempted to eliminate any symptoms present from other problems such as trapeziometacarpal arthritis, which is prevalent in this group of patients and a confounding factor not usually considered when reviewing outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DASH and Patient Evaluation Measure were both validated for assessing hand function, unlike the assessments of function used in many previous investigations of the distal radius. [11][12][13] A comparative Patient Evaluation Measure was also calculated by obtaining scores for the uninjured and injured arms separately, and subtracting the uninjured score from that of the injured one. This attempted to eliminate any symptoms present from other problems such as trapeziometacarpal arthritis, which is prevalent in this group of patients and a confounding factor not usually considered when reviewing outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand has been crossculturally adapted in various languages, including Dutch, and has been validated in patients with upper extremity injuries. 17,[28][29][30][31][32] Lower Extremity Functional Scale. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a body region-specific questionnaire that can be used to assess lower extremity function.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEM score is also the only outcome measure validated in terms of content regarding distal radial fractures, as it was specifically evaluated for such injuries. 4 They were given to patients in clinic at 12 months after surgery. This was returned on the day or by post.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%