2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-007-9049-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The internal consistency and precedence of key process areas in the capability maturity model for software

Abstract: Evaluating the reliability of maturity level (ML) ratings is crucial for providing confidence in the results of software process assessments. This study investigates the dimensions underlying the maturity construct in the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) for Software (SW-CMM) and estimates the internal consistency of each dimension. The results suggest that SW-CMM maturity is a three-dimensional construct, with "Project Implementation" representing the ML 2 key process areas (KPAs), "Organization Implementation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several thousands of organizations have been assessed on the base of CMMI and SPICE around the world 4 [41], and assessment results for process capability have been used as a base for many important decisions, such as ''actions to improve internal software processes, large-scale acquisitions, and contract monitoring'' [48]; however, there are insufficient studies to explain those phenomena in the RBV and ISSM. Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien [78] also recommended an integrated model that includes IS capabilities and ISSMs.…”
Section: Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several thousands of organizations have been assessed on the base of CMMI and SPICE around the world 4 [41], and assessment results for process capability have been used as a base for many important decisions, such as ''actions to improve internal software processes, large-scale acquisitions, and contract monitoring'' [48]; however, there are insufficient studies to explain those phenomena in the RBV and ISSM. Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien [78] also recommended an integrated model that includes IS capabilities and ISSMs.…”
Section: Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear transformation of the variable scores, like the coding used in this study, is also known to have a very small risk of spurious interactions [51]. A previous study provided ample confidence in the internal-consistency reliability over 0.9 of that measure [48].…”
Section: Process Maturitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The present study uses Cronbach's alpha because it is a popular method for measuring internal consistency (Jung & Goldenson, 2008). In the early stages of research on an assessment instrument, reliabilities of 0.7 or higher are considered sufficient for narrow constructs (Van DeVen & Ferry, 1980).…”
Section: 4 Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%