1972
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197254040-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interfascicular Nerve-Grafting of the Median and Ulnar Nerves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
108
0
17

Year Published

1976
1976
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 465 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
108
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods for repairing nerve gaps can be roughly classified into two categories: 1) bridging, which includes grafting and tubulization techniques, and 2) under tension end-to-end suturing of the nerve stumps. The former techniques are more effective, since they avoid tension across the repair site (Millesi et al 1972;Battiston et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for repairing nerve gaps can be roughly classified into two categories: 1) bridging, which includes grafting and tubulization techniques, and 2) under tension end-to-end suturing of the nerve stumps. The former techniques are more effective, since they avoid tension across the repair site (Millesi et al 1972;Battiston et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] After nerve trauma, the standard clinical operating procedure is to appose the two nerve ends and suture them together without generating tension where possible. If the gap is large, such that tensionless apposition is not possible, a nerve autograft -typically the patient's own sural nerve -is used as a bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present the results of a similar longitudinal study to assess the neurophysiological changes that occurred during the recovery period of 16 severely injured peripheral nerves of the forearm which were repaired with autogenous sural nerve grafts using the technique described by Millesi et al in 1972. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%