1978
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.41.8.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological studies of autogenous sural nerve grafts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic averaging of up to 1000 recordings allowed the small sensory action potentials (0.05-0.1 pV) to be distinguished from background noise (see also Buchthal and Kuhl, 1979;Krarup et al, 1990). This tech- (Ballantyne and Campbell, 1973;Tallis et al, 1978). The earliest time at which a sensory nerve action potential (CSAP) evoked by electrical stimulation at the base of digit II could be recorded was similar for all three repair groups (direct suture 56-154 d, nerve guide 83-118 d, or nerve graft 75-98 d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Electronic averaging of up to 1000 recordings allowed the small sensory action potentials (0.05-0.1 pV) to be distinguished from background noise (see also Buchthal and Kuhl, 1979;Krarup et al, 1990). This tech- (Ballantyne and Campbell, 1973;Tallis et al, 1978). The earliest time at which a sensory nerve action potential (CSAP) evoked by electrical stimulation at the base of digit II could be recorded was similar for all three repair groups (direct suture 56-154 d, nerve guide 83-118 d, or nerve graft 75-98 d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is in agreement with previous estimates (the advance of Tinel's sign and of returning sensibility, Seddon et al, 1943;Bowden and Sholl, 1954). With percutaneous recording it took 2.5-4 times longer before the first sensory potential could be distinguished from noise (Ballantyne and Campbell, 1973;Tallis et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used percutaneous recording, and a sensory potential was not detected until 10 months after suture. Similarly, Tallis et al (1978) did not find a sensory potential until 18 months after a graft had been inserted. In both studies the maximum sensory and motor conduction velocity recovered to 70-85% of normal; the amplitude of the sensory potential returned to 15% of normal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The observation that the amplitude of the CAP increases with ongoing regeneration {2, 4, 40) receives support from single-unit analysis: All types of afferents generate significantly larger action potentials during late regeneration than during early regeneration 128). Progressive increase of the CAPs during the process of regeneration is the result of two factors: an increasingly greater number of axons regrowing toward the periphery, and the larger action potentials generated by the axons as their size recovers.…”
Section: Functional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 94%