“…Compared with the sulfide ceramics, the oxide ceramics show a larger electrochemical window, a much better stability in air, and a much lower cost. Oxide garnet-type (e.g., Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 ) [14][15][16][17][18][19], NASICON-type (e.g., Li 1+x MxTi 2-x (PO 4 ) 3 , M = Al, Ge) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], perovskite-type (e.g., Li 3x La( 2/3)−x (1/3)−2x TiO 3 ) [27][28][29][30][31], and antiperovskite-type electrolytes (e.g., Li 2 OHX, X = Cl, Br) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] have been reported to have high Li-ion conductivities at room temperature because of the suitable Li-ion transport channel inside the framework. Garnet and antiperovskite electrolytes are reported to be unstable in moist air, and the reaction between them and moisture destroys the structure, reduces the Li-ion conductivity of the solid electrolyte, and significantly increases Li-ion resistance across the interface [39][40][41].…”