No abstract

We report on the transport properties of lithium ion conducting glass ceramics represented by the general composition Li1+x–y Al x 3+M y 5+M2–x–y 4+(PO4)3 with NASICON-type structure and their stability in contact with lithium metal. In particular, solid electrolyte phases with M = Ge, M = Ti, Ge, and M = Ti, Ta were investigated. AC impedance spectroscopy and DC polarization measurements were applied to determine the conductivity as a function of temperature, and to extract the partial electronic conductivity. The maximum total conductivity at room temperature was found to be about 4 × 10–4 S/cm for the solely Ge containing sample. We demonstrate that the combination of vacuum-based lithium thin film deposition and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is well suited to study the reactivity of the solid electrolyte membranes in contact with lithium. As a major result, we show that none of the materials investigated is stable in contact with lithium metal, and we discuss the reactive interaction between solid electrolytes and Li metal in terms of the formation of a mixed (ionic/electronic) conducting interphase (MCI) following the well-known SEI concept in liquid electrolytes.

SummaryResearch devoted to room temperature lithium–sulfur (Li/S8) and lithium–oxygen (Li/O2) batteries has significantly increased over the past ten years. The race to develop such cell systems is mainly motivated by the very high theoretical energy density and the abundance of sulfur and oxygen. The cell chemistry, however, is complex, and progress toward practical device development remains hampered by some fundamental key issues, which are currently being tackled by numerous approaches. Quite surprisingly, not much is known about the analogous sodium-based battery systems, although the already commercialized, high-temperature Na/S8 and Na/NiCl2 batteries suggest that a rechargeable battery based on sodium is feasible on a large scale. Moreover, the natural abundance of sodium is an attractive benefit for the development of batteries based on low cost components. This review provides a summary of the state-of-the-art knowledge on lithium–sulfur and lithium–oxygen batteries and a direct comparison with the analogous sodium systems. The general properties, major benefits and challenges, recent strategies for performance improvements and general guidelines for further development are summarized and critically discussed. In general, the substitution of lithium for sodium has a strong impact on the overall properties of the cell reaction and differences in ion transport, phase stability, electrode potential, energy density, etc. can be thus expected. Whether these differences will benefit a more reversible cell chemistry is still an open question, but some of the first reports on room temperature Na/S8 and Na/O2 cells already show some exciting differences as compared to the established Li/S8 and Li/O2 systems.

The discharging and charging of batteries require ion transfer across phase boundaries. In conventional lithium-ion batteries, Li(+) ions have to cross the liquid electrolyte and only need to pass the electrode interfaces. Future high-energy batteries may need to work as hybrids, and so serially combine a liquid electrolyte and a solid electrolyte to suppress unwanted redox shuttles. This adds new interfaces that might significantly decrease the cycling-rate capability. Here we show that the interface between a typical fast-ion-conducting solid electrolyte and a conventional liquid electrolyte is chemically unstable and forms a resistive solid-liquid electrolyte interphase (SLEI). Insights into the kinetics of this new type of interphase are obtained by impedance studies of a two-chamber cell. The chemistry of the SLEI, its growth with time and the influence of water impurities are examined by state-of-the-art surface analysis and depth profiling.

No abstract