1991
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0355(199121)12:1<1::aid-imhj2280120102>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction of home environment features and their relation to infant competence

Abstract: This investigation examined the relation between features of the home environment (HOME Scale) and domains of development (Griffiths Scales) in 6‐month‐olds. The sample consisted of 155 families with diverse demographic characteristics who were part of a larger study. Data were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression. More favorable eye‐hand development was associated with more availability of appropriate play materials. The interaction of appropriate play materials and maternal involvement was related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Finally, a study conducted in a large metropolitan area in the United States found differences in 6-month-old infants' overall development scores between infants from middle/high income households and those in low-income households. 12 Thus, while many other studies have noted sociodemographic disparities by 24 months of age, few have documented it within the first year of life, and this study is one of the first to do so using a nationally-representative sample of contemporary infants in the United States. It should be kept in mind that this is a descriptive report of social indicators of well-being among a national cohort of infants, and as such, bivariate analyses were conducted.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Finally, a study conducted in a large metropolitan area in the United States found differences in 6-month-old infants' overall development scores between infants from middle/high income households and those in low-income households. 12 Thus, while many other studies have noted sociodemographic disparities by 24 months of age, few have documented it within the first year of life, and this study is one of the first to do so using a nationally-representative sample of contemporary infants in the United States. It should be kept in mind that this is a descriptive report of social indicators of well-being among a national cohort of infants, and as such, bivariate analyses were conducted.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…10,11 However, a few previous studies conducted in the United States and elsewhere have found sociodemographic disparities in development within the first year of life. [12][13][14] For example, a recent study conducted with over 1,000 infants born in the Nord-Trondelag County in Norway between August 1990 and July 1991 found that "double risk" signified by a combination of biological and sociodemographic risk factors when children were 7 months of age correlated highly with developmental problems at age 4. 14 Another study conducted in Montreal found that infants in high-and moderate-risk groups (based on mother's marital status, age, and income) had lower mental scores on the Bayley than low-risk infants.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Country-level HDI factors related to many caregiving activities. Despite considerable diversity among parents in low-SES families, research points to developmental disparities based on sociodemographic risk status even within the first 2 years of life (Brooks-Gunn & Duncan, 1997; Parks & Bradley, 1991; Rostad, Nyberg, & Sivberg, 2008). For example, Halle et al (2009) identified significant disparities in cognitive and socioemotional development as early as 9 months of age in a nationally representative U.S. sample based on low income and low maternal education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, both types of interactions elicited longer and more mature play episodes than the absence of interaction. Others have found an association between the quality of maternal involvement and children’s concurrent play maturity (Alessandri, 1992) and subsequent social and language development (Parks & Bradley, 1991). Equally important is parents’ sensitivity to their children’s needs and activities.…”
Section: Importance Of Parent–child Interaction During Early Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%